Luke
Chapter: 14
And it came to pass, as he went into the house of one of the chief Pharisees to eat bread on the sabbath day, that they watched him.
6 of 35
And, behold, there was a certain man before him which had the dropsy.
7 of 35
And Jesus answering spake unto the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day?
8 of 35
And they held their peace. And he took him, and healed him, and let him go;
9 of 35
And answered them, saying, Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the sabbath day?
10 of 35
And they could not answer him again to these things.
11 of 35
And he put forth a parable to those which were bidden, when he marked how they chose out the chief rooms; saying unto them,
12 of 35
When thou art bidden of any man to a wedding, sit not down in the highest room; lest a more honourable man than thou be bidden of him;
13 of 35
And he that bade thee and him come and say to thee, Give this man place; and thou begin with shame to take the lowest room.
14 of 35
But when thou art bidden, go and sit down in the lowest room; that when he that bade thee cometh, he may say unto thee, Friend, go up higher: then shalt thou have worship in the presence of them that sit at meat with thee.
15 of 35
For whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.
16 of 35
Then said he also to him that bade him, When thou makest a dinner or a supper, call not thy friends, nor thy brethren, neither thy kinsmen, nor thy rich neighbours; lest they also bid thee again, and a recompence be made thee.
17 of 35
But when thou makest a feast, call the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind:
18 of 35
And thou shalt be blessed; for they cannot recompense thee: for thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just.
19 of 35
And when one of them that sat at meat with him heard these things, he said unto him, Blessed is he that shall eat bread in the kingdom of God.
20 of 35
Then said he unto him, A certain man made a great supper, and bade many:
21 of 35
And sent his servant at supper time to say to them that were bidden, Come; for all things are now ready.
22 of 35
And they all with one consent began to make excuse. The first said unto him, I have bought a piece of ground, and I must needs go and see it: I pray thee have me excused.
23 of 35
And another said, I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I go to prove them: I pray thee have me excused.
24 of 35
And another said, I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come.
25 of 35
So that servant came, and shewed his lord these things. Then the master of the house being angry said to his servant, Go out quickly into the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in hither the poor, and the maimed, and the halt, and the blind.
26 of 35
And the servant said, Lord, it is done as thou hast commanded, and yet there is room.
27 of 35
And the lord said unto the servant, Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled.
28 of 35
For I say unto you, That none of those men which were bidden shall taste of my supper.
29 of 35
And there went great multitudes with him: and he turned, and said unto them,
30 of 35
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
31 of 35
And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.
32 of 35
For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it?
33 of 35
Lest haply, after he hath laid the foundation, and is not able to finish it, all that behold it begin to mock him,
34 of 35
Saying, This man began to build, and was not able to finish.
35 of 35
Or what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand?
36 of 35
Or else, while the other is yet a great way off, he sendeth an ambassage, and desireth conditions of peace.
37 of 35
So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.
38 of 35
Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be seasoned?
39 of 35
It is neither fit for the land, nor yet for the dunghill; but men cast it out. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.
40 of 35
Luke 14
CHURCH FATHERS: 17
1. Clement of Rome | CHURCH FATHER
97 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Clement of Rome
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
2. Ignatius of Antioch | CHURCH FATHER
110 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Ignatius of Antioch
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
3. Barnabas | CHURCH FATHER
130 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Barnabas
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
4. Hermas | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Hermas
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
5. Papias of Hierapolis | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Papias of Hierapolis
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
6. Polycarp | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Polycarp
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
7. Didache | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Didache
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
8. Diognetus | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Diognetus
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
9. Justin Martyr | CHURCH FATHER
155 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Justin Martyr
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
10. Irenaeous | CHURCH FATHER
202 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Irenaeous
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
11. Clement of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
215 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Clement of Alexandria
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
12. Tertullian | CHURCH FATHER
220 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Tertullian
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
13. Origen | CHURCH FATHER
254 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Origen
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
14. Eusebius of Caesarea | CHURCH FATHER
340 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Eusebius of Caesarea
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
15. Athanasius of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
367 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Athanasius of Alexandria
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
16. Cyril of Jerusalem | CHURCH FATHER
386 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cyril of Jerusalem
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
17. Augustine of Hippo | CHURCH FATHER
400 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Augustine of Hippo
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 14
BIBLE CANON: 5
A biblical canon is a set of texts (or "books") which a particular religious community regards as authoritative scripture. Christians were the first to use the term in reference to scripture.
These bible canons have developed through debate and agreement by the religious authorities.
1. Marcion Canon | BIBLE CANON
140 AD
Marcionism was a religious movement based on the teachings of the 2nd-century Marcion of Sinope. Marcions Canon lists 14 books out of the 27 books in the New Testament. More specifically, these were Luke and Paul's 13 writings. Marcion even rejected the entire Old Testament of 39 books.
bible.ca/marcion
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Marcion Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
2. Muratorian Canon | BIBLE CANON
170 AD
The Muratorian Canon is an ancient list of New Testament books - the oldest such list we have found and lists 22 of the 27 books that were later included in the New Testament of the Christian Bible.
It is noteworthy that the Muratorian Canon omits several epistles that later did win acceptance in the Christian New Testament such as the books of James and 2 Peter.
gotquestions.org/muratorian
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Muratorian Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
3. Apostolic Canon | BIBLE CANON
300 AD
Apostolic Canons or Ecclesiastical Canons
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Apostolic Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
4. Cheltenham/ Mommsen List | BIBLE CANON
360 AD
The Cheltenham or Mommsen List is a Latin manuscript discovered by the German classical scholar Theodor Mommsen (published 1886) which probably originated in North Africa in the 4th century.
It has 24-book Old Testament and 24-book New Testament which omits Jude and James, and perhaps Hebrews, and questions the epistles of John and Peter.
bible-researcher.com/cheltenham
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cheltenham/ Mommsen List
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
5. Council of Rome | BIBLE CANON
382 AD
The Council of Rome was a meeting of Catholic Church officials and theologians which took place in 382 under the authority of Pope Damasus I, bishop of Rome.
According to a document appended to some manuscripts, the Council of Rome affirmed the authority of the Old and New Testament canon in a decretal or damasine list.
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Council of Rome
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 14
TEXTUAL CRITICISM
Luke 14
VIDEO: 79
5:11
9461 views · 42 mins ago |
8 years ago
1 of 79
9461
1456185600
1714175453
Who Wrote The Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John? - Bart Ehrman
000311
1
7:23
4262 views · 13 hrs ago |
7 years ago
2 of 79
4262
1482796800
1714130175
In Luke 9:10, Jesus' apostles withdrew to the town Bethsaida - HolyLandSite
000443
2
11:31
7482 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
3 of 79
7482
1482796800
1714163769
In Luke 10:18, I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000691
3
8:45
2100 views · 47 mins ago |
7 years ago
4 of 79
2100
1490659200
1714175169
Jesus feeding 5,000 and contradictions between Mark and Luke's account - Mike Licona
000525
4
5:09
5941 views · 14 mins ago |
7 years ago
5 of 79
5941
1493856000
1714177154
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke and John actually author the Gospels? - Darrell Bock
000309
5
49:16
4464 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
6 of 79
4464
1493856000
1714171504
New Testament: Gospel of Luke - Dale Martin 6/23
002956
6
8:17
2956 views · 23 hrs ago |
7 years ago
7 of 79
2956
1493856000
1714093601
Bible Project: Luke
000497
7
10:54
7465 views · 9 hrs ago |
7 years ago
8 of 79
7465
1501545600
1714144708
In Luke 21:20, Jesus predicted Titus Flavius, Arch of Titus and Siege of Jerusalem
000654
8
30:40
2953 views · 17 hrs ago |
7 years ago
9 of 79
2953
1501545600
1714116376
John the Baptist was baptizing in the River Jordan. Were Sins forgiven? - Paul William vs Luke
001840
9
7:31
4232 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
10 of 79
4232
1501545600
1714169920
Forged Fiction: Gospel of Luke
000451
10
37:39
5037 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
11 of 79
5037
1501545600
1714164136
In Matthew 24 and Luke 21, Jesus prophecized destruction of Jewish Temple. But, Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous Texts written AFTER the Event - Tovia Singer
002259
11
39:01
4301 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
12 of 79
4301
1501545600
1714162962
Darwin left Gradualism as a 'falsification test' for his Dawinian Theory - Suboor Ahmad vs Agnostic Luke
002341
12
10:48
7778 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
13 of 79
7778
1501894583
1714168868
In Luke 8:45, Jesus asks who touched me. In Mark and Matthew's Gospel, why is a different account given? - Rizwan vs American Lady
000648
13
12:06
22996 views · 22 mins ago |
7 years ago
14 of 79
22996
1505259041
1714176678
In Exodus 3:14, John 6:20, John 8:24, John 8:58, Mark 6:50, Mark 13:6, Luke 21:8, Matthew 14:27 and Acts 26:29 Jesus claims I AM (Ego Eimi) God - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000726
14
1:10:57
3015 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
15 of 79
3015
1507658044
1714163235
Luke the Liar wrote Acts as Historical Fiction - Richard Carrier
004257
15
24:01
7872 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
16 of 79
7872
1510767852
1714153026
The 3 most questionnable Bible verses: Luke 23:44, Mark 15:38 or Matthew 27:52? - Ken Humphreys
001441
16
12:06
4463 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
17 of 79
4463
1510817351
1714153060
Contradictions in the Birth and Geneaology of Jesus in the gospels of Matthew and Luke - Ken Humphreys
000726
17
26:58
6314 views · 33 mins ago |
6 years ago
18 of 79
6314
1511300162
1714176052
The Biblical gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John) were originally 'Nameless' Anonymous Texts - Daniel Wallace
001618
18
1:32
4242 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
19 of 79
4242
1512437630
1714164777
Jesus was not God according to Mark, Matthew, Luke and Apostle Paul - Karen Armstrong
000092
19
2:29
1994 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
20 of 79
1994
1512438067
1714170033
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous pre-existing Texts. We do not have any Originals - Mike Licona
000149
20
28:13
5825 views · 8 mins ago |
6 years ago
21 of 79
5825
1512501625
1714177511
Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong
001693
21
19:43
2573 views · 37 mins ago |
6 years ago
22 of 79
2573
1514607045
1714175778
In Luke 23:34, this is a Textual Variant, a verse added to the Bible. It's a forgery so I do not preach it - James White
001183
22
3:02
2702 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
23 of 79
2702
1515884443
1714172062
In Luke 23:34, Father Forgive Them, this is a known forgery and later addition - James White
000182
23
6:17
7270 views · 42 mins ago |
6 years ago
24 of 79
7270
1515887553
1714175505
In Luke 13:33, no Prophet will die outside Jerusalem. Yet, Jesus did? - Zakir Hussain vs James White
000377
24
59:18
3385 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
25 of 79
3385
1516193779
1714168705
What kind of Jew was Apostle Paul? - Luke Timothy Johnson
003558
25
3:52
6088 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
26 of 79
6088
1516193776
1714164834
Apostle Paul, Paganism and New Testament - Luke Timothy Johnson
000232
26
6:56
4545 views · 12 hrs ago |
6 years ago
27 of 79
4545
1516193676
1714135151
Was Christianity influenced by Graeco-Roman Paganism? - Luke Timothy Johnson
000416
27
2:27
3007 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
28 of 79
3007
1516193676
1714165685
Paganism, Christianity and Today's Christians - Luke Timothy Johnson
000147
28
59:12
3196 views · 49 mins ago |
6 years ago
29 of 79
3196
1523592047
1714175038
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - Ali Ataie
003552
29
0:45
5197 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
30 of 79
5197
1526689243
1714170562
Gospel of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were written by anonymous Authors - Daniel Wallace
000045
30
0:16
7368 views · 42 mins ago |
6 years ago
31 of 79
7368
1529106416
1714175456
Gospels were not written by Mark, Matthew, Luke or John. These names were decided 100 years later - Bart Ehrman
000016
31
2:41
3162 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
32 of 79
3162
1529281401
1714173493
Luke, author of Acts copies and contradicts his travelling companion, Apostle Paul - Richard Carrier
000161
32
3:53
2965 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
33 of 79
2965
1529281428
1714170716
John copies from Mark, Matthew and Luke and adds his own reasoning, experts agree - Richard Carrier
000233
33
0:36
3207 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
34 of 79
3207
1529332033
1714158388
Jesus never claimed to be divine or God-like in Matthew, Mark or Luke - Bart Ehrman
000036
34
1:09
7136 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
35 of 79
7136
1529332023
1714158543
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John could not read or write. Who wrote the Gospels? - Bart Ehrman
000069
35
2:27
2741 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
36 of 79
2741
1529332027
1714158633
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John have too many differences and contradictions - Bart Ehrman
000147
36
1:17
2547 views · 5 mins ago |
6 years ago
37 of 79
2547
1529776893
1714177722
95% of our Jesus birth narrative comes from Luke - John Dominic Crossan
000077
37
3:22
6606 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
38 of 79
6606
1529793131
1714168223
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John... Where's the other Gospels, Acts and Epistles? - Bart Ehrman
000202
38
1:22
6473 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
39 of 79
6473
1530141496
1714168018
Matthew, Mark and Luke are similar and different. Were the Gospel differences 'inspired' by God? - Bart Ehrman
000082
39
0:26
3339 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
40 of 79
3339
1530141495
1714160108
Mark was copied by Matthew and Luke - Bart Ehrman
000026
40
0:45
2959 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
41 of 79
2959
1530141509
1714160160
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are NOT objective, historically accurate accounts of Jesus' life - Bart Ehrman
000045
41
2:06
3194 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
42 of 79
3194
1530142882
1714160485
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are written by Anonymous Authors in third-person (i.e. they) - Bart Ehrman
000126
42
2:29
3746 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
43 of 79
3746
1530142891
1714160496
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John authored by highly-educated, literate, 2nd gen. Greek speakers - Bart Ehrman
000149
43
8:02
2732 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
44 of 79
2732
1530142905
1714166899
On Jesus' birth, Matthew and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000482
44
3:44
3516 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
45 of 79
3516
1530143088
1714161161
On Jesus' death, Mark and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000224
45
3:07
5625 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
46 of 79
5625
1530143053
1714163485
Luke's Gospel depicts Jesus as a prophet with a universal message, rejected by his people - Bart Ehrman
000187
46
1:54
6309 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
47 of 79
6309
1530143044
1714163500
Luke Gospel, a 14th century manuscript (109) proves a scribe incorrectly copied Jesus' geneology - Bart Ehrman
000114
47
0:41
5277 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
48 of 79
5277
1530742149
1714163629
If Mark's Gospel was based on eyewitness', why did Matthew & Luke 'radically' edit it? - Bart Ehrman
000041
48
1:37
5164 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
49 of 79
5164
1530742143
1714173697
Irenaeus (180 AD) named popular, 'anonymous' texts Mark, Matthew, Luke, John for Apostolic reasons - Bart Ehrman
000097
49
1:12
4268 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
50 of 79
4268
1530742285
1714171528
Matthew and Luke 'revised' the order of historical events copied from Mark's Gospel - Richard Bauckham
000072
50
1:02
3061 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
51 of 79
3061
1530742021
1714162062
If Matthew and Luke revised Mark, what about the earlier 'unchecked' Oral tradition? - Bart Ehrman
000062
51
0:57
2195 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
52 of 79
2195
1531349688
1714172684
Mark, Matthew, Luke or John do not give eyewitness' names or their sources - Richard Carrier
000057
52
1:55
4281 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
53 of 79
4281
1531338369
1714163781
Jesus in Luke's Gospel plagarized from Elijah-Elisha in 1 Kings - Richard Carrier
000115
53
2:11
1884 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
54 of 79
1884
1531350464
1714171786
In Luke, the stories of Jesus-Temple and Jesus-Emeous bear striking similarities - Richard Carrier
000131
54
4:06
5509 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
55 of 79
5509
1531349897
1714174067
In Luke 16:20, Lazarus is fiction. John makes Lazarus into a real, dying/rising person - Richard Carrier
000246
55
2:40
7785 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
56 of 79
7785
1531349897
1714165862
On the Gospel writers: Matthew copied Mark, Luke copied Matthew and Mark, John copied Luke - Richard Carrier
000160
56
1:33
2709 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
57 of 79
2709
1531551571
1714170177
In Luke 11:2, the 'Lords Prayer' was probably elongated by later Scribes - Bruce Metzger
000093
57
2:00
5277 views · 4 mins ago |
6 years ago
58 of 79
5277
1531555781
1714177752
On Luke 17:34, KJV translators added 'Men'. Earliest Greek Bible manuscripts have no 'Men' - Bruce Metzger
000120
58
0:36
3093 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
59 of 79
3093
1532037755
1714163268
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John do not compliment each other, but are 'competitive' - Charles Hedrick
000036
59
1:36
3501 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
60 of 79
3501
1532037762
1714163305
Mark, Matthew & Luke write of Jesus a mythical Jewish Man who did 'mighty deeds' - Charles Hedrick
000096
60
1:25
6273 views · 3 mins ago |
6 years ago
61 of 79
6273
1532147216
1714177848
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John are 4 Gospels. Their are 34 more Gospels - Charles Hedrick
000085
61
1:11
3275 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
62 of 79
3275
1533831758
1714164293
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John are anonymous texts named later (false ascriptions) - Bart Ehrman
000071
62
0:38
10877 views · 57 mins ago |
6 years ago
63 of 79
10877
1533564004
1714174588
After 100 years, Church Fathers refered to gospels as Matthew, Mark, Luke & John - Bart Ehrman
000038
63
7:10
4292 views · 1 min ago |
5 years ago
64 of 79
4292
1542651448
1714177931
Mark is the most reliable Gospel. Matthew, Luke and John are later 'corrections' of Mark - Godless Engineer
000430
64
13:11
5716 views · 39 mins ago |
5 years ago
65 of 79
5716
1547044666
1714175672
In Luke 10:18 and Acts 9:3, both Jesus and Apostle Paul saw 'flash of brightness'. Did they see Satan? - Jeffrey Daugherty
000791
65
13:09
3514 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
66 of 79
3514
1548092471
1714169278
In Luke 11:2, Jesus taught his disciples the Lord's Prayer, not Trinity - Muhammad Lamin
000789
66
8:25
4212 views · 5 mins ago |
5 years ago
67 of 79
4212
1548093914
1714177724
In Luke 24:19, Jesus of Nazareth is called a man who was a 'Jewish Prophet' - Muhammad Lamin
000505
67
14:50
2906 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
68 of 79
2906
1549213440
1714169112
Gospel of Luke. Says who? (Comedy Anime)
000890
68
3:02
4284 views · 51 mins ago |
5 years ago
69 of 79
4284
1549453760
1714174915
In Luke 1:35, Jesus is 'Son of God', not God, not Trinity - Anthony Buzzard
000182
69
1:11:46
3317 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
70 of 79
3317
1559006507
1714161736
In Luke 1:3, Luke was 'inspired' by other writings, and so he decided to write too - Mansur Ahmad vs Man
004306
70
3:55
6562 views · 1 hr ago |
5 years ago
71 of 79
6562
1559259700
1714172874
Jesus became the Passover Lamb in John's Gospel, not Mark, Matthew or Luke - Tovia Singer
000235
71
2:28
5653 views · 53 mins ago |
5 years ago
72 of 79
5653
1566862429
1714174796
John's Gospel is different from Mark, Matthew and Luke due to emerging Gnostic ideas - Kegan Chandler
000148
72
6:42
4016 views · 11 hrs ago |
5 years ago
73 of 79
4016
1570024798
1714137704
Was the 'fake' Jesus' Resurrection in Mark 9-20 copied by Matthew, Luke and John? - TruthSurge
000402
73
8:41
4199 views · 13 mins ago |
5 years ago
74 of 79
4199
1570025788
1714177227
Gospel of Luke: 14% Reliability Score against 'US Federal Rules' - TruthSurge
000521
74
5:52
3471 views · 4 mins ago |
5 years ago
75 of 79
3471
1570734745
1714177772
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John & Apostle Paul are not real, Historical men, but Literary fictitious characters - Joseph Atwill
000352
75
4:25
4579 views · 1 min ago |
5 years ago
76 of 79
4579
1570804850
1714177917
Jesus of Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John was a Jew - Adele Reinhartz
000265
76
3:30
8264 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
77 of 79
8264
1571010245
1714165474
Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke, John disagreed over Torah, Jewish Law & Gentiles - Richard Carrier
000210
77
1:21
4267 views · 4 hrs ago |
4 years ago
78 of 79
4267
1572279402
1714164957
Matthew and Luke copied from Gospel of Mark - Bart Ehrman
000081
78
3:26
4351 views · 1 hr ago |
4 years ago
79 of 79
4351
1572279411
1714172919
Gospel Authors of Luke and Acts are Anonymous and Unknown - Bart Ehrman
000206
79
22555 views · 0 secs ago
IMPORTANT: All Scripture text has context and background. Scripture should never be read literally or in isolation. Always seek clarification from religious scholars and teachers. In general, Scripture adheres to four principles: (1) Literal Meaning - What the Scripture says (2) Historical Setting - The story events; how the Scripture was understood in its time (3) Grammar - The surrounding sentence and paragraph; textual context (4) Synthesis - A comparison with similar Scripture to give a better contextual understanding