Luke
Chapter: 15
Then drew near unto him all the publicans and sinners for to hear him.
6 of 32
And the Pharisees and scribes murmured, saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with them.
7 of 32
And he spake this parable unto them, saying,
8 of 32
What man of you, having an hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness, and go after that which is lost, until he find it?
9 of 32
And when he hath found it, he layeth it on his shoulders, rejoicing.
10 of 32
And when he cometh home, he calleth together his friends and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with me; for I have found my sheep which was lost.
11 of 32
I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.
12 of 32
Either what woman having ten pieces of silver, if she lose one piece, doth not light a candle, and sweep the house, and seek diligently till she find it?
13 of 32
And when she hath found it, she calleth her friends and her neighbours together, saying, Rejoice with me; for I have found the piece which I had lost.
14 of 32
Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.
15 of 32
And he said, A certain man had two sons:
16 of 32
And the younger of them said to his father, Father, give me the portion of goods that falleth to me. And he divided unto them his living.
17 of 32
And not many days after the younger son gathered all together, and took his journey into a far country, and there wasted his substance with riotous living.
18 of 32
And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land; and he began to be in want.
19 of 32
And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine.
20 of 32
And he would fain have filled his belly with the husks that the swine did eat: and no man gave unto him.
21 of 32
And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger!
22 of 32
I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,
23 of 32
And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy hired servants.
24 of 32
And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him.
25 of 32
And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son.
26 of 32
But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:
27 of 32
And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry:
28 of 32
For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry.
29 of 32
Now his elder son was in the field: and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard musick and dancing.
30 of 32
And he called one of the servants, and asked what these things meant.
31 of 32
And he said unto him, Thy brother is come; and thy father hath killed the fatted calf, because he hath received him safe and sound.
32 of 32
And he was angry, and would not go in: therefore came his father out, and intreated him.
33 of 32
And he answering said to his father, Lo, these many years do I serve thee, neither transgressed I at any time thy commandment: and yet thou never gavest me a kid, that I might make merry with my friends:
34 of 32
But as soon as this thy son was come, which hath devoured thy living with harlots, thou hast killed for him the fatted calf.
35 of 32
And he said unto him, Son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have is thine.
36 of 32
It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found.
37 of 32
Luke 15
CHURCH FATHERS: 17
1. Clement of Rome | CHURCH FATHER
97 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Clement of Rome
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
2. Ignatius of Antioch | CHURCH FATHER
110 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Ignatius of Antioch
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
3. Barnabas | CHURCH FATHER
130 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Barnabas
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
4. Hermas | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Hermas
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
5. Papias of Hierapolis | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Papias of Hierapolis
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
6. Polycarp | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Polycarp
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
7. Didache | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Didache
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
8. Diognetus | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Diognetus
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
9. Justin Martyr | CHURCH FATHER
155 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Justin Martyr
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
10. Irenaeous | CHURCH FATHER
202 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Irenaeous
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
11. Clement of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
215 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Clement of Alexandria
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
12. Tertullian | CHURCH FATHER
220 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Tertullian
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
13. Origen | CHURCH FATHER
254 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Origen
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
14. Eusebius of Caesarea | CHURCH FATHER
340 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Eusebius of Caesarea
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
15. Athanasius of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
367 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Athanasius of Alexandria
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
16. Cyril of Jerusalem | CHURCH FATHER
386 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cyril of Jerusalem
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
17. Augustine of Hippo | CHURCH FATHER
400 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Augustine of Hippo
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 15
BIBLE CANON: 5
A biblical canon is a set of texts (or "books") which a particular religious community regards as authoritative scripture. Christians were the first to use the term in reference to scripture.
These bible canons have developed through debate and agreement by the religious authorities.
1. Marcion Canon | BIBLE CANON
140 AD
Marcionism was a religious movement based on the teachings of the 2nd-century Marcion of Sinope. Marcions Canon lists 14 books out of the 27 books in the New Testament. More specifically, these were Luke and Paul's 13 writings. Marcion even rejected the entire Old Testament of 39 books.
bible.ca/marcion
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Marcion Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
2. Muratorian Canon | BIBLE CANON
170 AD
The Muratorian Canon is an ancient list of New Testament books - the oldest such list we have found and lists 22 of the 27 books that were later included in the New Testament of the Christian Bible.
It is noteworthy that the Muratorian Canon omits several epistles that later did win acceptance in the Christian New Testament such as the books of James and 2 Peter.
gotquestions.org/muratorian
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Muratorian Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
3. Apostolic Canon | BIBLE CANON
300 AD
Apostolic Canons or Ecclesiastical Canons
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Apostolic Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
4. Cheltenham/ Mommsen List | BIBLE CANON
360 AD
The Cheltenham or Mommsen List is a Latin manuscript discovered by the German classical scholar Theodor Mommsen (published 1886) which probably originated in North Africa in the 4th century.
It has 24-book Old Testament and 24-book New Testament which omits Jude and James, and perhaps Hebrews, and questions the epistles of John and Peter.
bible-researcher.com/cheltenham
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cheltenham/ Mommsen List
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
5. Council of Rome | BIBLE CANON
382 AD
The Council of Rome was a meeting of Catholic Church officials and theologians which took place in 382 under the authority of Pope Damasus I, bishop of Rome.
According to a document appended to some manuscripts, the Council of Rome affirmed the authority of the Old and New Testament canon in a decretal or damasine list.
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Council of Rome
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 15
TEXTUAL CRITICISM
Luke 15
VIDEO: 79
5:11
9438 views · 9 hrs ago |
8 years ago
1 of 79
9438
1456185600
1714026810
Who Wrote The Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John? - Bart Ehrman
000311
1
7:23
4252 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
2 of 79
4252
1482796800
1714043668
In Luke 9:10, Jesus' apostles withdrew to the town Bethsaida - HolyLandSite
000443
2
11:31
7471 views · 24 mins ago |
7 years ago
3 of 79
7471
1482796800
1714056163
In Luke 10:18, I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000691
3
8:45
2091 views · 7 hrs ago |
7 years ago
4 of 79
2091
1490659200
1714031448
Jesus feeding 5,000 and contradictions between Mark and Luke's account - Mike Licona
000525
4
5:09
5928 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
5 of 79
5928
1493856000
1714042543
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke and John actually author the Gospels? - Darrell Bock
000309
5
49:16
4446 views · 16 mins ago |
7 years ago
6 of 79
4446
1493856000
1714056647
New Testament: Gospel of Luke - Dale Martin 6/23
002956
6
8:17
2954 views · 5 hrs ago |
7 years ago
7 of 79
2954
1493856000
1714039288
Bible Project: Luke
000497
7
10:54
7452 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
8 of 79
7452
1501545600
1714050636
In Luke 21:20, Jesus predicted Titus Flavius, Arch of Titus and Siege of Jerusalem
000654
8
30:40
2949 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
9 of 79
2949
1501545600
1714052422
John the Baptist was baptizing in the River Jordan. Were Sins forgiven? - Paul William vs Luke
001840
9
7:31
4223 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
10 of 79
4223
1501545600
1714050259
Forged Fiction: Gospel of Luke
000451
10
37:39
5024 views · 6 mins ago |
7 years ago
11 of 79
5024
1501545600
1714057228
In Matthew 24 and Luke 21, Jesus prophecized destruction of Jewish Temple. But, Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous Texts written AFTER the Event - Tovia Singer
002259
11
39:01
4285 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
12 of 79
4285
1501545600
1714051347
Darwin left Gradualism as a 'falsification test' for his Dawinian Theory - Suboor Ahmad vs Agnostic Luke
002341
12
10:48
7760 views · 43 mins ago |
7 years ago
13 of 79
7760
1501894583
1714055039
In Luke 8:45, Jesus asks who touched me. In Mark and Matthew's Gospel, why is a different account given? - Rizwan vs American Lady
000648
13
12:06
22942 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
14 of 79
22942
1505259041
1714051387
In Exodus 3:14, John 6:20, John 8:24, John 8:58, Mark 6:50, Mark 13:6, Luke 21:8, Matthew 14:27 and Acts 26:29 Jesus claims I AM (Ego Eimi) God - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000726
14
1:10:57
3007 views · 16 hrs ago |
7 years ago
15 of 79
3007
1507658044
1713999670
Luke the Liar wrote Acts as Historical Fiction - Richard Carrier
004257
15
24:01
7866 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
16 of 79
7866
1510767852
1714049500
The 3 most questionnable Bible verses: Luke 23:44, Mark 15:38 or Matthew 27:52? - Ken Humphreys
001441
16
12:06
4449 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
17 of 79
4449
1510817351
1714042121
Contradictions in the Birth and Geneaology of Jesus in the gospels of Matthew and Luke - Ken Humphreys
000726
17
26:58
6292 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
18 of 79
6292
1511300162
1714050925
The Biblical gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John) were originally 'Nameless' Anonymous Texts - Daniel Wallace
001618
18
1:32
4229 views · 18 hrs ago |
6 years ago
19 of 79
4229
1512437630
1713992908
Jesus was not God according to Mark, Matthew, Luke and Apostle Paul - Karen Armstrong
000092
19
2:29
1988 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
20 of 79
1988
1512438067
1714036880
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous pre-existing Texts. We do not have any Originals - Mike Licona
000149
20
28:13
5801 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
21 of 79
5801
1512501625
1714044133
Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong
001693
21
19:43
2566 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
22 of 79
2566
1514607045
1714035365
In Luke 23:34, this is a Textual Variant, a verse added to the Bible. It's a forgery so I do not preach it - James White
001183
22
3:02
2693 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
23 of 79
2693
1515884443
1714035880
In Luke 23:34, Father Forgive Them, this is a known forgery and later addition - James White
000182
23
6:17
7253 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
24 of 79
7253
1515887553
1714048085
In Luke 13:33, no Prophet will die outside Jerusalem. Yet, Jesus did? - Zakir Hussain vs James White
000377
24
59:18
3377 views · 13 hrs ago |
6 years ago
25 of 79
3377
1516193779
1714009858
What kind of Jew was Apostle Paul? - Luke Timothy Johnson
003558
25
3:52
6067 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
26 of 79
6067
1516193776
1714035452
Apostle Paul, Paganism and New Testament - Luke Timothy Johnson
000232
26
6:56
4531 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
27 of 79
4531
1516193676
1714020765
Was Christianity influenced by Graeco-Roman Paganism? - Luke Timothy Johnson
000416
27
2:27
3000 views · 23 hrs ago |
6 years ago
28 of 79
3000
1516193676
1713974013
Paganism, Christianity and Today's Christians - Luke Timothy Johnson
000147
28
59:12
3182 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
29 of 79
3182
1523592047
1714044311
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - Ali Ataie
003552
29
0:45
5176 views · 9 hrs ago |
6 years ago
30 of 79
5176
1526689243
1714026560
Gospel of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were written by anonymous Authors - Daniel Wallace
000045
30
0:16
7339 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
31 of 79
7339
1529106416
1714040989
Gospels were not written by Mark, Matthew, Luke or John. These names were decided 100 years later - Bart Ehrman
000016
31
2:41
3149 views · 16 hrs ago |
6 years ago
32 of 79
3149
1529281401
1713998973
Luke, author of Acts copies and contradicts his travelling companion, Apostle Paul - Richard Carrier
000161
32
3:53
2958 views · 16 hrs ago |
6 years ago
33 of 79
2958
1529281428
1713998977
John copies from Mark, Matthew and Luke and adds his own reasoning, experts agree - Richard Carrier
000233
33
0:36
3203 views · 14 hrs ago |
6 years ago
34 of 79
3203
1529332033
1714006593
Jesus never claimed to be divine or God-like in Matthew, Mark or Luke - Bart Ehrman
000036
34
1:09
7117 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
35 of 79
7117
1529332023
1714034485
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John could not read or write. Who wrote the Gospels? - Bart Ehrman
000069
35
2:27
2736 views · 12 hrs ago |
6 years ago
36 of 79
2736
1529332027
1714015371
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John have too many differences and contradictions - Bart Ehrman
000147
36
1:17
2537 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
37 of 79
2537
1529776893
1714021872
95% of our Jesus birth narrative comes from Luke - John Dominic Crossan
000077
37
3:22
6577 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
38 of 79
6577
1529793131
1714050793
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John... Where's the other Gospels, Acts and Epistles? - Bart Ehrman
000202
38
1:22
6448 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
39 of 79
6448
1530141496
1714038062
Matthew, Mark and Luke are similar and different. Were the Gospel differences 'inspired' by God? - Bart Ehrman
000082
39
0:26
3334 views · 13 hrs ago |
6 years ago
40 of 79
3334
1530141495
1714009973
Mark was copied by Matthew and Luke - Bart Ehrman
000026
40
0:45
2955 views · 43 mins ago |
6 years ago
41 of 79
2955
1530141509
1714055035
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are NOT objective, historically accurate accounts of Jesus' life - Bart Ehrman
000045
41
2:06
3188 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
42 of 79
3188
1530142882
1714031858
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are written by Anonymous Authors in third-person (i.e. they) - Bart Ehrman
000126
42
2:29
3740 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
43 of 79
3740
1530142891
1714030937
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John authored by highly-educated, literate, 2nd gen. Greek speakers - Bart Ehrman
000149
43
8:02
2724 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
44 of 79
2724
1530142905
1714021617
On Jesus' birth, Matthew and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000482
44
3:44
3512 views · 13 hrs ago |
6 years ago
45 of 79
3512
1530143088
1714011905
On Jesus' death, Mark and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000224
45
3:07
5611 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
46 of 79
5611
1530143053
1714040297
Luke's Gospel depicts Jesus as a prophet with a universal message, rejected by his people - Bart Ehrman
000187
46
1:54
6291 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
47 of 79
6291
1530143044
1714045312
Luke Gospel, a 14th century manuscript (109) proves a scribe incorrectly copied Jesus' geneology - Bart Ehrman
000114
47
0:41
5261 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
48 of 79
5261
1530742149
1714042027
If Mark's Gospel was based on eyewitness', why did Matthew & Luke 'radically' edit it? - Bart Ehrman
000041
48
1:37
5145 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
49 of 79
5145
1530742143
1714042933
Irenaeus (180 AD) named popular, 'anonymous' texts Mark, Matthew, Luke, John for Apostolic reasons - Bart Ehrman
000097
49
1:12
4252 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
50 of 79
4252
1530742285
1714040204
Matthew and Luke 'revised' the order of historical events copied from Mark's Gospel - Richard Bauckham
000072
50
1:02
3054 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
51 of 79
3054
1530742021
1714042225
If Matthew and Luke revised Mark, what about the earlier 'unchecked' Oral tradition? - Bart Ehrman
000062
51
0:57
2188 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
52 of 79
2188
1531349688
1714042563
Mark, Matthew, Luke or John do not give eyewitness' names or their sources - Richard Carrier
000057
52
1:55
4274 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
53 of 79
4274
1531338369
1714042318
Jesus in Luke's Gospel plagarized from Elijah-Elisha in 1 Kings - Richard Carrier
000115
53
2:11
1878 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
54 of 79
1878
1531350464
1714053683
In Luke, the stories of Jesus-Temple and Jesus-Emeous bear striking similarities - Richard Carrier
000131
54
4:06
5487 views · 38 mins ago |
6 years ago
55 of 79
5487
1531349897
1714055332
In Luke 16:20, Lazarus is fiction. John makes Lazarus into a real, dying/rising person - Richard Carrier
000246
55
2:40
7763 views · 9 hrs ago |
6 years ago
56 of 79
7763
1531349897
1714026667
On the Gospel writers: Matthew copied Mark, Luke copied Matthew and Mark, John copied Luke - Richard Carrier
000160
56
1:33
2700 views · 17 hrs ago |
6 years ago
57 of 79
2700
1531551571
1713996835
In Luke 11:2, the 'Lords Prayer' was probably elongated by later Scribes - Bruce Metzger
000093
57
2:00
5256 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
58 of 79
5256
1531555781
1714046452
On Luke 17:34, KJV translators added 'Men'. Earliest Greek Bible manuscripts have no 'Men' - Bruce Metzger
000120
58
0:36
3085 views · 14 hrs ago |
6 years ago
59 of 79
3085
1532037755
1714008087
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John do not compliment each other, but are 'competitive' - Charles Hedrick
000036
59
1:36
3493 views · 12 hrs ago |
6 years ago
60 of 79
3493
1532037762
1714012660
Mark, Matthew & Luke write of Jesus a mythical Jewish Man who did 'mighty deeds' - Charles Hedrick
000096
60
1:25
6245 views · 38 mins ago |
6 years ago
61 of 79
6245
1532147216
1714055345
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John are 4 Gospels. Their are 34 more Gospels - Charles Hedrick
000085
61
1:11
3272 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
62 of 79
3272
1533831758
1714037566
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John are anonymous texts named later (false ascriptions) - Bart Ehrman
000071
62
0:38
10846 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
63 of 79
10846
1533564004
1714044297
After 100 years, Church Fathers refered to gospels as Matthew, Mark, Luke & John - Bart Ehrman
000038
63
7:10
4278 views · 7 hrs ago |
5 years ago
64 of 79
4278
1542651448
1714033060
Mark is the most reliable Gospel. Matthew, Luke and John are later 'corrections' of Mark - Godless Engineer
000430
64
13:11
5702 views · 2 mins ago |
5 years ago
65 of 79
5702
1547044666
1714057505
In Luke 10:18 and Acts 9:3, both Jesus and Apostle Paul saw 'flash of brightness'. Did they see Satan? - Jeffrey Daugherty
000791
65
13:09
3507 views · 31 mins ago |
5 years ago
66 of 79
3507
1548092471
1714055752
In Luke 11:2, Jesus taught his disciples the Lord's Prayer, not Trinity - Muhammad Lamin
000789
66
8:25
4201 views · 49 mins ago |
5 years ago
67 of 79
4201
1548093914
1714054687
In Luke 24:19, Jesus of Nazareth is called a man who was a 'Jewish Prophet' - Muhammad Lamin
000505
67
14:50
2897 views · 43 mins ago |
5 years ago
68 of 79
2897
1549213440
1714055037
Gospel of Luke. Says who? (Comedy Anime)
000890
68
3:02
4274 views · 41 mins ago |
5 years ago
69 of 79
4274
1549453760
1714055161
In Luke 1:35, Jesus is 'Son of God', not God, not Trinity - Anthony Buzzard
000182
69
1:11:46
3307 views · 19 hrs ago |
5 years ago
70 of 79
3307
1559006507
1713987834
In Luke 1:3, Luke was 'inspired' by other writings, and so he decided to write too - Mansur Ahmad vs Man
004306
70
3:55
6545 views · 7 hrs ago |
5 years ago
71 of 79
6545
1559259700
1714034061
Jesus became the Passover Lamb in John's Gospel, not Mark, Matthew or Luke - Tovia Singer
000235
71
2:28
5629 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
72 of 79
5629
1566862429
1714038733
John's Gospel is different from Mark, Matthew and Luke due to emerging Gnostic ideas - Kegan Chandler
000148
72
6:42
4011 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
73 of 79
4011
1570024798
1714048813
Was the 'fake' Jesus' Resurrection in Mark 9-20 copied by Matthew, Luke and John? - TruthSurge
000402
73
8:41
4187 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
74 of 79
4187
1570025788
1714040733
Gospel of Luke: 14% Reliability Score against 'US Federal Rules' - TruthSurge
000521
74
5:52
3462 views · 29 mins ago |
5 years ago
75 of 79
3462
1570734745
1714055855
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John & Apostle Paul are not real, Historical men, but Literary fictitious characters - Joseph Atwill
000352
75
4:25
4557 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
76 of 79
4557
1570804850
1714041081
Jesus of Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John was a Jew - Adele Reinhartz
000265
76
3:30
8240 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
77 of 79
8240
1571010245
1714050586
Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke, John disagreed over Torah, Jewish Law & Gentiles - Richard Carrier
000210
77
1:21
4258 views · 5 hrs ago |
4 years ago
78 of 79
4258
1572279402
1714038936
Matthew and Luke copied from Gospel of Mark - Bart Ehrman
000081
78
3:26
4343 views · 7 mins ago |
4 years ago
79 of 79
4343
1572279411
1714057176
Gospel Authors of Luke and Acts are Anonymous and Unknown - Bart Ehrman
000206
79
22463 views · 0 secs ago
IMPORTANT: All Scripture text has context and background. Scripture should never be read literally or in isolation. Always seek clarification from religious scholars and teachers. In general, Scripture adheres to four principles: (1) Literal Meaning - What the Scripture says (2) Historical Setting - The story events; how the Scripture was understood in its time (3) Grammar - The surrounding sentence and paragraph; textual context (4) Synthesis - A comparison with similar Scripture to give a better contextual understanding