2235 views · 7 hrs ago | Author: Guest • Updated: 19 Jun 2019 |
1429
1502278627
1614481696
99% of the foremost Bible Scholars, believe the historical Jesus in Mark's Gospel is more accurate than John's Gospel - Paul William vs Richard London
000754
8
1513
1512501625
1614421514
Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong
001693
11
1139
1529332037
1614483233
In John, Jesus is a God-like diety from Heaven. In earlier Gospels, Jesus is more of a man-prophet - Bart Ehrman
000119
16
859
1532036808
1614445374
John's Gospel presents Jesus as a pre-existing divine Son, coming from the Father - Charles Hedrick
000119
25
790
1566862375
1614431156
John's Gospel wrote a 'multi-level' history to counter Gnostic views on Jesus - Kegan Chandler
000061
39
776
1566862352
1614479864
Evidence that John's Gospel used Poemandres (Hermetic, Pagan, c. 50 AD) as a Source - Kegan Chandler
000540
42
931
1566862333
1614419642
John's Gospel depicts 'the right' Jesus; against Judaism, Gnostic-Christianity and Hermetism - Kegan Chandler
000130
45
638
1570022293
1614462660
Mark's Gospel casts James & John, Jesus' disciples from Castor & Polydeuces, brothers in Greek mythology - TruthSurge
000899
46
486
1570804863
1614483678
John's Gospel presents high Christology, and an ambiguous 'divine' Jewish Jesus - Adele Reinhartz
000463
51