Video Description (from Youtube)
British family General Practitioner and author, Dr Malcolm Kendrick, writing about the PCR test, states:
“[I]t is totally inappropriate to use RT-PCR as a screening test for a virus in an asymptomatic population when the prevalence of the infection is very low.
Even if there were a test with 99% specificity, you would still expect to get 3500 false positives from performing 350,000 tests – which is still greater than the number of “cases” reported. When the number of “cases” is lower than your rate of false positives, then a positive result on its own is virtually meaningless.
The PCR test is best utilized as a diagnostic test to confirm the diagnosis of an infection based on clinical signs and symptoms. It certainly should not be used as a screening test when there is low prevalence of disease and should NEVER be used as the sole determinant in the diagnosis of a case.” …
“Politicians and Health Officials are basing their numbers of cases entirely on the results of these tests, which are not fit for this purpose.
They are then using these figures to terrorise the population, and to justify decisions to impose local lockdowns, and increase nonsensical general restrictions which are having a massive impact on people’s lives and their health, and also on the economy, particularly hitting small businesses hard.”
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/09/28/false-positive-tests/
Shared on: 12 Oct 2020
DISCLAIMER
All videos are for educational purposes only. The video is hosted on Youtube. The Video Title is derived from the original Youtube video title, video content, dialogue, speech or general content theme. The Video Title does not represent the views of any individual, speaker, organisation or business.
Video Titles are further edited and optimized for SEO, keyword density, information and internal/external search. If you spot any mistake, omission or to report abuse kindly
contact us.