9879 views · 8 hrs ago | Author: Guest • Updated: 19 Jun 2019 |
7223
1502278627
1729545061
99% of the foremost Bible Scholars, believe the historical Jesus in Mark's Gospel is more accurate than John's Gospel - Paul William vs Richard London
000754
8
7182
1512501625
1729691389
Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong
001693
11
6657
1529332037
1729721409
In John, Jesus is a God-like diety from Heaven. In earlier Gospels, Jesus is more of a man-prophet - Bart Ehrman
000119
16
3960
1532036808
1729739434
John's Gospel presents Jesus as a pre-existing divine Son, coming from the Father - Charles Hedrick
000119
25
7268
1566862375
1729600860
John's Gospel wrote a 'multi-level' history to counter Gnostic views on Jesus - Kegan Chandler
000061
39
5864
1566862352
1729667032
Evidence that John's Gospel used Poemandres (Hermetic, Pagan, c. 50 AD) as a Source - Kegan Chandler
000540
42
7533
1566862333
1729746883
John's Gospel depicts 'the right' Jesus; against Judaism, Gnostic-Christianity and Hermetism - Kegan Chandler
000130
45
5978
1570022293
1729677437
Mark's Gospel casts James & John, Jesus' disciples from Castor & Polydeuces, brothers in Greek mythology - TruthSurge
000899
46
3668
1570804863
1729710524
John's Gospel presents high Christology, and an ambiguous 'divine' Jewish Jesus - Adele Reinhartz
000463
51