Codex Sinaiticus is the earliest complete New Testament manuscript. It is dated to 312 years after Jesus' Crucifixion.
The original, handwritten 27 books of the New Testament most likely disappeared within a few decades after being written. We are left with thousands of manuscripts, papyri and handwritten copies in many different languages.The earliest complete copy of the New Testament is found in the Codex Sinaiticus which dates to 330-360 AD, or 345 AD median year. As Jesus was crucified in 33 AD, Christianity is left with a gap of 312 years in its scriptural evidences.
NOTE: Earlier Biblical Manuscripts than the Codex Sinaiticus are available (i.e. papyrus P52), but these are incomplete, fragmentary, and only have a few words or verses of the originals.
| DATING | % | Mid |
| Traditional: 65-75 AD 2 | 0% (not available) | 70 AD |
| Papyrus: P45 (Egypt) 250 AD 4 | x% (y words, parchment) | 250 AD (180 yr gap) |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD 3 | 100% | 345 AD (275 yr gap) |
2 TRADITIONAL dating is widely acknowledged by Christians
3 MANUSCRIPT is earliest complete copy of text
4 PAPYRUS is earliest fragment of text (i.e. few words, verses)
| DATING |
| Traditional: 75-100 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P104 (Egypt) 150-200 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 75-100 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P4 (Egypt) 150-200 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 90-110 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P52 (Egypt) 200 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 80-90 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: 0189 200 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 56-58 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P46 175-225 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 50-60 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P46 175-225 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 55-57 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P46 175-225 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 48-55 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P46 175-225 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 80-95 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P46 175-225 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 50-60 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P46 175-225 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 80-95 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P46 175-225 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 50-60 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P46 175-225 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 80-95 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P92 (Egypt) 300 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 62 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P32 (Egypt) 100-300 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 67 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P32 (Egypt) 100-300 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 62 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P32 (Egypt) 100-300 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 50-60 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P87 250 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 70-90 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P46 175-225 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 90-140 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P20 (Egypt) 250-300 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 90-95 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P72 250-350 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 125-150 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P72 250-350 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 90-110 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P9 (Egypt) 250-300 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 90-110 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: - |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 90-110 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: - |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 90-140 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P72 250-350 AD |
| DATING |
| Traditional: 90-95 AD |
| Manuscript: Codex Sinaiticus (Egypt) 330-360 AD |
| Papyrus: P98 150-200 AD |
The test was carried out in a laboratory at the University of Oxford. The result places the leaves close to the time of the Prophet Muhammad, who is generally thought to have lived between 570 and 632 AD.
The tests carried out on the parchment of the Birmingham folios yield the strong probability that the animal from which it was taken was alive during the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad or shortly afterwards.
These portions must have been in a form that is very close to the form of the Quran read today, supporting the view that the [Quran] text has undergone little or no alteration and that it can be dated to a point very close to the time it was believed to be revealed.
David Thomas, Professor of Christianity and Islam. University of Birmingham Birmingham University
CREDIT
https://www.biblequery.org/ntmss.html
https://library.duke.edu/rubenstein/scriptorium/papyrus/texts/manuscripts.html
http://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/
https://callingchristians.com/2017/04/05/a-brief-insight-into-the-new-testaments-prototyping
https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/2015/07/quran-manuscript-22-07-15.aspx
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham_Quran_manuscript
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_the_Bible
| 4807 views · 59 mins ago | Author: Guest • Updated: 11 Jun 2019 |
31:35
1969
1493856000
1679411559
How can you trust a Bible with no Manuscript? - Shamsi vs Christian
001895
1
8:25
3718
1493856000
1679429382
Do we have the Original Manuscripts of the New Testament? - Bart Ehrman vs Daniel Wallace
000505
2
10:42
3659
1493856000
1679429183
Can we reconstruct the Original Manuscripts of New Testament? - Bart Ehrman vs Nabeel Qureshi
000642
3
2:35
2809
1493856000
1679392334
Oldest Quran manuscript dated to 568-645 AD discovered in University of Birmingham
000155
4
48:07
2922
1501545600
1679419566
Earliest Bible Manuscripts are dated to 4th century. So what is Christian doctrine based on? - Hashim vs American Todd
002887
5
44:45
3699
1501545600
1679430144
Mark 16:9-20 is missing in the Earliest Bible Manuscripts: Codex Sinaiticus (350 AD) and Codex Vaticanus (300 AD)
002685
6
27:03
3355
1512067206
1679428514
For 300 years, we have worked to restore the original New Testament Bible. With 1,000 un-discovered manuscripts, we need more time - Daniel Wallace 1/2
001623
7
21:54
3574
1512067208
1679428240
For 300 years, we have worked to restore the original New Testament Bible. With 1,000 un-discovered manuscripts, we need more time - Daniel Wallace 2/2
001314
8
6:10
6041
1515151323
1679422616
In Matthew 28:19, before Nicaea, Bible manuscripts had no Trinity. After Nicaea 325 AD, Trinity appeared in later manuscripts - Carey Clark
000370
9
53:09
2918
1525208904
1679365650
Church Fathers, Historians, Manuscripts and blind Faith prove Jesus spoke in John 1:1 - Anwar London vs Christian Jools
003189
10
0:56
2435
1529106345
1679413035
We do not have the original New Testament manuscripts - Daniel Wallace
000056
11
1:08
1711
1529106342
1679265531
Bible manuscripts have 1000's of textual differences - Daniel Wallace
000068
12
2:12
4706
1529106346
1679406843
In Revelation 13:18, the oldest manuscript has 'the Beast' as #616, not #666 - Daniel Wallace
000132
13
2:32
2912
1529106357
1679421890
In Mark 16:9-20, the earliest manuscripts do not have these 11 extra verses. Scribes added them later - Daniel Wallace
000152
14
2:13
4684
1529454387
1679421688
In 1 John 5:7-8, the Trinity verse was added by later scribes. It is missing from the earliest Greek manuscripts - Bart Ehrman
000133
15
3:41
4131
1530143045
1679423819
In 1707 AD, John Mill reported on 30,000 textual variants in 100 Bible manuscripts - Bart Ehrman
000221
16
1:54
3863
1530143044
1679431116
Luke Gospel, a 14th century manuscript (109) proves a scribe incorrectly copied Jesus' geneology - Bart Ehrman
000114
17
0:41
3203
1531554790
1679423617
5,300 New Testament Greek manuscripts survive today. No two manuscripts agree - Bruce Metzger
000041
18
0:50
2225
1531553269
1679402806
Earliest Bible manuscripts are most reliable. Later manuscripts are elaborated and longer - Bruce Metzger
000050
19
2:00
3073
1531555781
1679407038
On Luke 17:34, KJV translators added 'Men'. Earliest Greek Bible manuscripts have no 'Men' - Bruce Metzger
000120
20
0:39
3185
1533124296
1679416547
In 1516 AD, Erasmus published first Greek NT Bible using unreliable manuscripts - Lorence Yufa (Milwaukee Athiests)
000039
21
1:05
3151
1534072413
1679401910
Roman Empire destroyed Christian texts & manuscripts in 'Book burnings' - Michael Kruger
000065
22
7:09
3390
1540506555
1679424083
In John 9:38 and John 20:28, the text is different to the early papyrus manuscripts
000429
23
14:41
2993
1552936954
1679423899
Origen, an Early Church Father, was known to tamper and corrupt Biblical manuscripts - Robert Wieland
000881
24
28:25
3542
1552936964
1679394005
Mark's Gospel has longer ending. Depends which manuscript you use? - Mansur Ahmad vs Christian
001705
25
7:39
2361
1553799546
1679421194
Birmingham Manuscript: The world's oldest Quran dates to Muhammad's life - Rebecca Watson
000459
26
10:13
3535
1570021309
1679409863
Jesus' Resurrection (Mark 9-20) is missing in earliest Bible Manuscripts, Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus - TruthSurge
000613
27
8:28
4932
1570022363
1679431313
In John 8:1-11, the 'Adulterous Woman' story is missing from earliest Bible manuscripts - TruthSurge
000508
28
8:25
2109
1570024742
1679408348
Ancient Bible manuscript corruption led to 'Chrestians, from Chrestos' became 'Christians, from Christ' - TruthSurge
000505
29
16:45
2781
1593471789
1679430048
In Quran 6:110, earliest Manuscripts agree on the Text. There is no Textual Variant issue - Farid Responds
001005
30
17:41
468
1663069473
1679398971
Evolution of Quran (Uthman) in relation to Sanaa Manuscripts (Yemen) - Al-Muqaddimah
001061
31
Results: 1 News Items
