Matthew
Chapter: 16
The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven.
6 of 28
He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red.
7 of 28
And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowring. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?
8 of 28
A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.
9 of 28
And when his disciples were come to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread.
10 of 28
Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.
11 of 28
And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have taken no bread.
12 of 28
Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread?
13 of 28
Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?
14 of 28
Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?
15 of 28
How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?
16 of 28
Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.
17 of 28
When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
18 of 28
And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
19 of 28
He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
20 of 28
And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
21 of 28
And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
22 of 28
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
23 of 28
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
24 of 28
Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
25 of 28
From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.
26 of 28
Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.
27 of 28
But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
28 of 28
Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
29 of 28
For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.
30 of 28
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
31 of 28
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
32 of 28
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
33 of 28
Matthew 16
CHURCH FATHERS: 17
1. Clement of Rome | CHURCH FATHER
97 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Clement of Rome
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
2. Ignatius of Antioch | CHURCH FATHER
110 AD
Matthew was REJECTED (0%) by Ignatius of Antioch
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
3. Barnabas | CHURCH FATHER
130 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Barnabas
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
4. Hermas | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Hermas
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
5. Papias of Hierapolis | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Matthew was REJECTED (0%) by Papias of Hierapolis
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
6. Polycarp | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Polycarp
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
7. Didache | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Didache
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
8. Diognetus | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Matthew was REJECTED (0%) by Diognetus
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
9. Justin Martyr | CHURCH FATHER
155 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Justin Martyr
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
10. Irenaeous | CHURCH FATHER
202 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Irenaeous
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
11. Clement of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
215 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Clement of Alexandria
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
12. Tertullian | CHURCH FATHER
220 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Tertullian
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
13. Origen | CHURCH FATHER
254 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Origen
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
14. Eusebius of Caesarea | CHURCH FATHER
340 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Eusebius of Caesarea
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
15. Athanasius of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
367 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Athanasius of Alexandria
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
16. Cyril of Jerusalem | CHURCH FATHER
386 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cyril of Jerusalem
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
17. Augustine of Hippo | CHURCH FATHER
400 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Augustine of Hippo
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Matthew 16
BIBLE CANON: 5
A biblical canon is a set of texts (or "books") which a particular religious community regards as authoritative scripture. Christians were the first to use the term in reference to scripture.
These bible canons have developed through debate and agreement by the religious authorities.
1. Marcion Canon | BIBLE CANON
140 AD
Marcionism was a religious movement based on the teachings of the 2nd-century Marcion of Sinope. Marcions Canon lists 14 books out of the 27 books in the New Testament. More specifically, these were Luke and Paul's 13 writings. Marcion even rejected the entire Old Testament of 39 books.
bible.ca/marcion
Matthew was REJECTED (0%) by Marcion Canon
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
2. Muratorian Canon | BIBLE CANON
170 AD
The Muratorian Canon is an ancient list of New Testament books - the oldest such list we have found and lists 22 of the 27 books that were later included in the New Testament of the Christian Bible.
It is noteworthy that the Muratorian Canon omits several epistles that later did win acceptance in the Christian New Testament such as the books of James and 2 Peter.
gotquestions.org/muratorian
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Muratorian Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
3. Apostolic Canon | BIBLE CANON
300 AD
Apostolic Canons or Ecclesiastical Canons
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Apostolic Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
4. Cheltenham/ Mommsen List | BIBLE CANON
360 AD
The Cheltenham or Mommsen List is a Latin manuscript discovered by the German classical scholar Theodor Mommsen (published 1886) which probably originated in North Africa in the 4th century.
It has 24-book Old Testament and 24-book New Testament which omits Jude and James, and perhaps Hebrews, and questions the epistles of John and Peter.
bible-researcher.com/cheltenham
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cheltenham/ Mommsen List
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
5. Council of Rome | BIBLE CANON
382 AD
The Council of Rome was a meeting of Catholic Church officials and theologians which took place in 382 under the authority of Pope Damasus I, bishop of Rome.
According to a document appended to some manuscripts, the Council of Rome affirmed the authority of the Old and New Testament canon in a decretal or damasine list.
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Council of Rome
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Matthew 16
TEXTUAL CRITICISM
Matthew 16
VIDEO: 113
42:32
6119 views · 52 mins ago |
9 years ago
1 of 113
6119
1438041600
1717396308
Can You Be Gay (Homosexual) and Christian? - Michael Brown vs Matthew Vines
002552
1
8:56
8675 views · 4 hrs ago |
8 years ago
2 of 113
8675
1456185600
1717386312
Apostle Paul was the Antichrist according to Early Christians (Matthew 5:17) - Robert Price
000536
2
5:11
9831 views · 5 hrs ago |
8 years ago
3 of 113
9831
1456185600
1717382827
Who Wrote The Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John? - Bart Ehrman
000311
3
10:21
11092 views · 51 mins ago |
7 years ago
4 of 113
11092
1483401600
1717396408
In Matthew 12:40, Jesus claims he will be in the Tomb for 3 days and 3 nights - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000621
4
4:51
4367 views · 7 hrs ago |
7 years ago
5 of 113
4367
1487808000
1717373834
In Matthew 24:36, why did Jesus deny knowledge of the final hour?
000291
5
9:05
9441 views · 41 mins ago |
7 years ago
6 of 113
9441
1490659200
1717396978
In Matthew 15:25, why did Jesus call the woman a dog? - Hashim
000545
6
6:56
4257 views · 5 hrs ago |
7 years ago
7 of 113
4257
1490659200
1717382278
In Matthew 27:52, did the graves of Saints open up? - Mike Licona
000416
7
18:30
7481 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
8 of 113
7481
1490659200
1717386784
In Matthew 2:15, Out of Egypt I called my son - Is this referring to Jesus? - Tovia Singer
001110
8
1:22:49
7377 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
9 of 113
7377
1490659200
1717387914
In Matthew 15:24, Jesus said he came for the Lost Sheep of Israel - Mohammed Hijab vs PhD Josh
004969
9
5:09
6275 views · 6 hrs ago |
7 years ago
10 of 113
6275
1493856000
1717378383
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke and John actually author the Gospels? - Darrell Bock
000309
10
48:17
7777 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
11 of 113
7777
1493856000
1717390782
New Testament: Gospel of Matthew - Dale Martin 4/23
002897
11
8:16
2670 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
12 of 113
2670
1493856000
1717384032
Bible Project: Matthew
000496
12
14:11
7148 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
13 of 113
7148
1501545600
1717387642
In Matthew 5:32, can a divorced woman get re-married? - Hashim vs Richard London
000851
13
24:06
6755 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
14 of 113
6755
1501545600
1717385511
In Matthew 10:34, Jesus did not bring Peace, but a Sword (violence) - Hashim vs Asian Christian
001446
14
6:05
4103 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
15 of 113
4103
1501545600
1717388468
Forged Fiction: Gospel of Matthew
000365
15
37:39
5276 views · 6 hrs ago |
7 years ago
16 of 113
5276
1501545600
1717379337
In Matthew 24 and Luke 21, Jesus prophecized destruction of Jewish Temple. But, Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous Texts written AFTER the Event - Tovia Singer
002259
16
10:48
8142 views · 54 mins ago |
7 years ago
17 of 113
8142
1501894583
1717396217
In Luke 8:45, Jesus asks who touched me. In Mark and Matthew's Gospel, why is a different account given? - Rizwan vs American Lady
000648
17
21:34
9029 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
18 of 113
9029
1502135992
1717392407
In Psalm 118:22, Matthew 21:32 and Acts 4:11; was Jesus the Cornerstone whom the Builders rejected? - Tovia Singer
001294
18
1:13:24
4672 views · 6 hrs ago |
7 years ago
19 of 113
4672
1503645911
1717378178
If Matthew's Gospel was written by a Liar. Did the Holy Spirit inspire the Lies? - Hamza Myatt vs PhD Josh 1/2
004404
19
1:10:33
5558 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
20 of 113
5558
1503645952
1717383474
If Matthew's Gospel was written by a Liar. Did the Holy Spirit inspire the Lies? - Hamza Myatt vs PhD Josh 2/2
004233
20
6:02
4615 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
21 of 113
4615
1504459841
1717386527
In Matthew 2:1, Three Wise Men came to Baby Jesus bearing gifts of Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh - OR - Were they actually Magicians and Sorcerers? - Religion For Breakfast
000362
21
59:47
6913 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
22 of 113
6913
1504459863
1717395443
In Matthew 28:19, Baptisms should have been in the Name of Father, Son and Holy Spirit - Hashim vs Spanish Lady
003587
22
12:06
24070 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
23 of 113
24070
1505259041
1717390183
In Exodus 3:14, John 6:20, John 8:24, John 8:58, Mark 6:50, Mark 13:6, Luke 21:8, Matthew 14:27 and Acts 26:29 Jesus claims I AM (Ego Eimi) God - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000726
23
47:41
10584 views · 20 mins ago |
7 years ago
24 of 113
10584
1508492852
1717398248
In Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1, Jesus came from Egypt. No other gospel narrates this event - Hamza Myatt vs Protestant Rich
002861
24
1:07:49
6196 views · 55 mins ago |
7 years ago
25 of 113
6196
1509437120
1717396172
In Matthew 15:24, Jesus claimed he was only sent to the Jews. But you claim Jesus came for the Gentiles (non-Jews) - Hamza Myatt vs Preacher Paul
004069
25
24:01
8188 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
26 of 113
8188
1510767852
1717393977
The 3 most questionnable Bible verses: Luke 23:44, Mark 15:38 or Matthew 27:52? - Ken Humphreys
001441
26
12:06
4716 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
27 of 113
4716
1510817351
1717394454
Contradictions in the Birth and Geneaology of Jesus in the gospels of Matthew and Luke - Ken Humphreys
000726
27
26:58
6683 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
28 of 113
6683
1511300162
1717394492
The Biblical gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John) were originally 'Nameless' Anonymous Texts - Daniel Wallace
001618
28
8:41
5116 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
29 of 113
5116
1511414822
1717391917
In Matthew 2:1, the three Kings (Magi) from the East followed a Star to baby Jesus were Pagans? - Tovia Singer
000521
29
1:32
4467 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
30 of 113
4467
1512437630
1717392677
Jesus was not God according to Mark, Matthew, Luke and Apostle Paul - Karen Armstrong
000092
30
19:58
8195 views · 44 mins ago |
6 years ago
31 of 113
8195
1512437634
1717396799
In Mark 6:52 and Matthew 14:33, Jesus walked on water. Did the disciples turn away or turn towards Jesus - Paul William vs Christian
001198
31
1:38
4165 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
32 of 113
4165
1512438070
1717393268
Matthew was originally in Aramaic. Anonymous scribes translated to Greek - Mike Licona
000098
32
2:29
2099 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
33 of 113
2099
1512438067
1717390545
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous pre-existing Texts. We do not have any Originals - Mike Licona
000149
33
28:13
6127 views · 47 mins ago |
6 years ago
34 of 113
6127
1512501625
1717396624
Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong
001693
34
35:17
6639 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
35 of 113
6639
1512501630
1717372703
From Isaiah 60:3, Matthew copies the Christmas Story. Baby Jesus born to Joseph, a fatherly figure invented to reconcile warring Jewish tribes - John Spong
002117
35
2:08
3610 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
36 of 113
3610
1513438705
1717388609
Originally, the Gospel of Matthew was an Anonymous text with no known Author. Who chose the name Matthew, when and why?
000128
36
22:14
4950 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
37 of 113
4950
1513818052
1717383878
In Matthew 24:36, No one knows the Hour, except the Father - Shamsi vs Christian
001334
37
11:40
4854 views · 54 mins ago |
6 years ago
38 of 113
4854
1514249579
1717396209
In Matthew 19:5, Jesus defined Marriage between Man and Woman - Robert Jeffress
000700
38
8:12
6064 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
39 of 113
6064
1514850983
1717376298
In Matthew 28:19, the Trinity text was a later insertion and corruption, after 200 AD, by the Catholic church
000492
39
5:29
9664 views · 11 mins ago |
6 years ago
40 of 113
9664
1514850975
1717398803
In Matthew 28:19, is not a Trinitarian verse. Trinity came through evolution and Early Church Fathers in 325 and 451 AD finally - Anthony Buzzard
000329
40
6:10
9847 views · 17 mins ago |
6 years ago
41 of 113
9847
1515151323
1717398411
In Matthew 28:19, before Nicaea, Bible manuscripts had no Trinity. After Nicaea 325 AD, Trinity appeared in later manuscripts - Carey Clark
000370
41
9:17
8034 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
42 of 113
8034
1516837967
1717392067
In Matthew 1:23 and Isaiah 7:14, was the virgin birth of Immanuel really Jesus? - Trinity Delusion
000557
42
11:12
8203 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
43 of 113
8203
1516837961
1717375789
In Matthew 1:23, why is Jesus called Immanuel? - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000672
43
5:08
2823 views · 18 hrs ago |
6 years ago
44 of 113
2823
1518390851
1717334559
In Matthew 4:1, Is Jesus God or part of God? - Incognito
000308
44
3:01
3986 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
45 of 113
3986
1519923783
1717373814
In Matthew 28:19, will everyone in the World become Christians? - Michael Brown
000181
45
33:57
5159 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
46 of 113
5159
1522452149
1717383596
Matthew copied Mark. Therefore, Matthew believed Mark's Gospel was imperfect and not God's word - Zakir Hussain vs Christian Colin
002037
46
59:12
3290 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
47 of 113
3290
1523592047
1717387908
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - Ali Ataie
003552
47
0:45
5473 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
48 of 113
5473
1526689243
1717388393
Gospel of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were written by anonymous Authors - Daniel Wallace
000045
48
20:01
2306 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
49 of 113
2306
1526869665
1717364165
In Matthew 1:17, Matthew makes a textual mistake. Was Matthew truthful, inspired by Spirit or a Liar? - Mansur vs Suzy 1/2
001201
49
13:51
2258 views · 1 day ago |
6 years ago
50 of 113
2258
1526869664
1717300630
In Matthew 1:17, Matthew makes a textual mistake. Was Matthew truthful, inspired by Spirit or a Liar? - Mansur vs Suzy 2/2
000831
50
33:46
4221 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
51 of 113
4221
1526986088
1717369741
In Matthew 27:52, a Zombie Apocalypse occurs with no eye-witness testimony. Get in your Time machine! - Paul William vs Lizzie
002026
51
3:15
4621 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
52 of 113
4621
1529106402
1717390457
Matthew and John quote Jesus' sermons 50 years after he died.. Really? - Bart Ehrman
000195
52
0:16
7781 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
53 of 113
7781
1529106416
1717384986
Gospels were not written by Mark, Matthew, Luke or John. These names were decided 100 years later - Bart Ehrman
000016
53
3:53
3061 views · 48 mins ago |
6 years ago
54 of 113
3061
1529281428
1717396550
John copies from Mark, Matthew and Luke and adds his own reasoning, experts agree - Richard Carrier
000233
54
0:36
3336 views · 10 mins ago |
6 years ago
55 of 113
3336
1529332033
1717398831
Jesus never claimed to be divine or God-like in Matthew, Mark or Luke - Bart Ehrman
000036
55
1:09
7507 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
56 of 113
7507
1529332023
1717386627
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John could not read or write. Who wrote the Gospels? - Bart Ehrman
000069
56
2:15
4338 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
57 of 113
4338
1529332043
1717393295
Gospel of Matthew: A collection of anonymous Jesus' stories, entitled 100 years later - Bart Ehrman
000135
57
2:27
2862 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
58 of 113
2862
1529332027
1717394208
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John have too many differences and contradictions - Bart Ehrman
000147
58
3:22
6937 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
59 of 113
6937
1529793131
1717394848
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John... Where's the other Gospels, Acts and Epistles? - Bart Ehrman
000202
59
1:22
6842 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
60 of 113
6842
1530141496
1717393916
Matthew, Mark and Luke are similar and different. Were the Gospel differences 'inspired' by God? - Bart Ehrman
000082
60
0:26
3454 views · 11 hrs ago |
6 years ago
61 of 113
3454
1530141495
1717358675
Mark was copied by Matthew and Luke - Bart Ehrman
000026
61
0:45
3041 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
62 of 113
3041
1530141509
1717374240
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are NOT objective, historically accurate accounts of Jesus' life - Bart Ehrman
000045
62
2:06
3297 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
63 of 113
3297
1530142882
1717378785
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are written by Anonymous Authors in third-person (i.e. they) - Bart Ehrman
000126
63
2:29
3880 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
64 of 113
3880
1530142891
1717389873
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John authored by highly-educated, literate, 2nd gen. Greek speakers - Bart Ehrman
000149
64
8:02
2828 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
65 of 113
2828
1530142905
1717369236
On Jesus' birth, Matthew and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000482
65
2:08
5910 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
66 of 113
5910
1530143083
1717390644
Matthew depicts Jesus as a Jewish Messiah, and emphasizes Jewish Law - Bart Ehrman
000128
66
0:53
4584 views · 16 hrs ago |
6 years ago
67 of 113
4584
1530143835
1717341527
Anonymous Texts given Apostolic titles, Matthew, Mark etc. to qualify for Bible NT canon - Bart Ehrman
000053
67
1:34
5089 views · 25 mins ago |
6 years ago
68 of 113
5089
1530143845
1717397953
Matthew recalls Jesus' 2000-word 'Sermon On The Mount', 55 years after Jesus delivered it? - Bart Ehrman
000094
68
0:41
5593 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
69 of 113
5593
1530742149
1717390900
If Mark's Gospel was based on eyewitness', why did Matthew & Luke 'radically' edit it? - Bart Ehrman
000041
69
1:37
5439 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
70 of 113
5439
1530742143
1717374245
Irenaeus (180 AD) named popular, 'anonymous' texts Mark, Matthew, Luke, John for Apostolic reasons - Bart Ehrman
000097
70
2:31
5543 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
71 of 113
5543
1530742098
1717377531
Papias (163 AD) described Matthew's Gospel as Jesus' sayings written in Hebrew - Bart Ehrman vs Richard Bauckham
000151
71
1:12
4514 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
72 of 113
4514
1530742285
1717390176
Matthew and Luke 'revised' the order of historical events copied from Mark's Gospel - Richard Bauckham
000072
72
1:02
3186 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
73 of 113
3186
1530742021
1717387492
If Matthew and Luke revised Mark, what about the earlier 'unchecked' Oral tradition? - Bart Ehrman
000062
73
0:57
2303 views · 20 hrs ago |
6 years ago
74 of 113
2303
1531349688
1717328592
Mark, Matthew, Luke or John do not give eyewitness' names or their sources - Richard Carrier
000057
74
3:03
4902 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
75 of 113
4902
1531349707
1717386815
In Matthew's Gospel, an 'onion ring' structure points to the Jesus Christ myth - Richard Carrier
000183
75
2:16
6169 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
76 of 113
6169
1531349807
1717387907
In Matthew's Gospel, an 'onion ring' structure details Jesus' Crucifixion - Richard Carrier
000136
76
2:40
8094 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
77 of 113
8094
1531349897
1717380077
On the Gospel writers: Matthew copied Mark, Luke copied Matthew and Mark, John copied Luke - Richard Carrier
000160
77
0:36
3208 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
78 of 113
3208
1532037755
1717374264
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John do not compliment each other, but are 'competitive' - Charles Hedrick
000036
78
1:36
3627 views · 14 mins ago |
6 years ago
79 of 113
3627
1532037762
1717398614
Mark, Matthew & Luke write of Jesus a mythical Jewish Man who did 'mighty deeds' - Charles Hedrick
000096
79
1:25
6681 views · 35 mins ago |
6 years ago
80 of 113
6681
1532147216
1717397357
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John are 4 Gospels. Their are 34 more Gospels - Charles Hedrick
000085
80
1:11
3379 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
81 of 113
3379
1533831758
1717395743
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John are anonymous texts named later (false ascriptions) - Bart Ehrman
000071
81
0:38
11281 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
82 of 113
11281
1533564004
1717392144
After 100 years, Church Fathers refered to gospels as Matthew, Mark, Luke & John - Bart Ehrman
000038
82
3:04
5862 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
83 of 113
5862
1533924568
1717389825
Using Matthew 19:12, Origen (d. 253 AD), an early Church Father castrated himself, removed his private part - Steven Anderson
000184
83
4:52
3036 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
84 of 113
3036
1535194567
1717383638
In Matthew 1:18, Jesus had a begining. He was 'born' into existence - Bart Ehrman (Restoration Fellllowship)
000292
84
10:13
3046 views · 11 hrs ago |
6 years ago
85 of 113
3046
1541415740
1717358765
Matthew misquotes Old Testament verse - Peleh Ben Avraham
000613
85
7:10
4547 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
86 of 113
4547
1542651448
1717393339
Mark is the most reliable Gospel. Matthew, Luke and John are later 'corrections' of Mark - Godless Engineer
000430
86
20:39
5132 views · 6 hrs ago |
5 years ago
87 of 113
5132
1548092471
1717377513
In Matthew 10:5, Jesus commanded his disciples preach to Israelites only ('lost sheep of Israel'), not Gentiles - Muhammad Lamin
001239
87
16:50
3784 views · 6 hrs ago |
5 years ago
88 of 113
3784
1548092464
1717377517
In Matthew 27:46, Jesus cried to God. Yet, Jesus himself is 'fully' God? - Muhammad Lamin
001010
88
11:42
4629 views · 11 hrs ago |
5 years ago
89 of 113
4629
1548092819
1717360849
In Matthew 26:39, Jesus prayed to God to save him from death (Crucifixion) in Gethsemane - Muhammad Lamin
000702
89
9:36
3956 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
90 of 113
3956
1548092817
1717387903
In Matthew 12:18, God refers to Jesus as a servant, and nothing more - Muhammad Lamin
000576
90
39:55
5631 views · 13 hrs ago |
5 years ago
91 of 113
5631
1549300283
1717351606
In Matthew 4:23, Jesus preached the gospel to the people. Can Matthew be the same gospel? - Mansur Ahmed vs American
002395
91
10:35
5399 views · 4 hrs ago |
5 years ago
92 of 113
5399
1549300191
1717386360
In Matthew 4:8, Satan took Jesus (God) willingly up the high mountain; contrary to James 1:13 - Adnan Rashid vs Christian
000635
92
21:04
3731 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
93 of 113
3731
1554734214
1717380428
In Matthew 2:23 and Zechariah 3:8, the branch (Nazar) translates to Jesus the Nazarene? - Sadat Anwar vs Christian 1/2
001264
93
13:47
3080 views · 8 hrs ago |
5 years ago
94 of 113
3080
1554734218
1717370367
In Matthew 2:23 and Zechariah 3:8, the branch (Nazar) translates to Jesus the Nazarene? - Sadat Anwar vs Christian 2/2
000827
94
11:23
3728 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
95 of 113
3728
1556045685
1717391866
In Daniel 7:13 and Matthew 16:27, 'Son of Man' is the Jewish nation, or Jewish Messiah, but not Jesus - Eli Cohen
000683
95
33:19
5383 views · 4 hrs ago |
5 years ago
96 of 113
5383
1557624702
1717386263
In Matthew 28:17, even 'some' Apostles doubted Jesus' resurrection - Jeffrey Daugherty
001999
96
24:29
5071 views · 8 mins ago |
5 years ago
97 of 113
5071
1557767434
1717399003
In Matthew 4:19, Jesus was in the 'People Fishing' business - Jeffrey Daugherty
001469
97
1:44
4526 views · 1 hr ago |
5 years ago
98 of 113
4526
1558442754
1717395291
Some Bible scholars believe Matthew did not write Matthew's gospel - Frank Turek
000104
98
10:13
4827 views · 40 mins ago |
5 years ago
99 of 113
4827
1558567640
1717397045
In Matthew 16:20, Jesus prohibited teaching he was the Christ (Anointed) - Jeffrey Daugherty
000613
99
34:09
4190 views · 4 hrs ago |
5 years ago
100 of 113
4190
1558810479
1717386238
In Matthew 9:13, Jesus desired Mercy not (be) Sacrificed on Cross - Jeffrey Daugherty
002049
100
3:55
6899 views · 4 hrs ago |
5 years ago
101 of 113
6899
1559259700
1717383352
Jesus became the Passover Lamb in John's Gospel, not Mark, Matthew or Luke - Tovia Singer
000235
101
20:36
4724 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
102 of 113
4724
1559263831
1717391900
In Matthew 15:24, Jesus called the Woman a Dog, then medicated her Daughter - Kane vs Muslim
001236
102
10:08
7373 views · 1 hr ago |
5 years ago
103 of 113
7373
1562627923
1717394470
In Matthew 27:52, thousands of dead rose from their graves. Is Jesus' resurrection a greater miracle? - Mansur Ahmad vs Christian 1/2
000608
103
20:53
7566 views · 7 hrs ago |
5 years ago
104 of 113
7566
1562627745
1717375637
In Matthew 27:52, thousands of dead rose from their graves. Is Jesus' resurrection a greater miracle? - Mansur Ahmad vs Christian 2/2
001253
104
2:28
6082 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
105 of 113
6082
1566862429
1717387536
John's Gospel is different from Mark, Matthew and Luke due to emerging Gnostic ideas - Kegan Chandler
000148
105
11:22
4970 views · 4 hrs ago |
5 years ago
106 of 113
4970
1570024754
1717385465
Gospel of Matthew: 29% Reliability Score against 'US Federal Rules' - TruthSurge 1/2
000682
106
8:44
4957 views · 22 mins ago |
5 years ago
107 of 113
4957
1570024733
1717398111
Gospel of Matthew: 29% Reliability Score against 'US Federal Rules' - TruthSurge 2/2
000524
107
2:15
3943 views · 1 hr ago |
5 years ago
108 of 113
3943
1570024789
1717394137
In Mark 16:5 & Matthew 28:2, a Man changes to Angel - TruthSurge
000135
108
6:42
4189 views · 12 mins ago |
5 years ago
109 of 113
4189
1570024798
1717398745
Was the 'fake' Jesus' Resurrection in Mark 9-20 copied by Matthew, Luke and John? - TruthSurge
000402
109
5:52
3658 views · 17 hrs ago |
5 years ago
110 of 113
3658
1570734745
1717339684
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John & Apostle Paul are not real, Historical men, but Literary fictitious characters - Joseph Atwill
000352
110
4:25
4868 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
111 of 113
4868
1570804850
1717387137
Jesus of Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John was a Jew - Adele Reinhartz
000265
111
3:30
8849 views · 13 mins ago |
5 years ago
112 of 113
8849
1571010245
1717398647
Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke, John disagreed over Torah, Jewish Law & Gentiles - Richard Carrier
000210
112
1:21
4589 views · 29 mins ago |
5 years ago
113 of 113
4589
1572279402
1717397716
Matthew and Luke copied from Gospel of Mark - Bart Ehrman
000081
113
36466 views · 0 secs ago
IMPORTANT: All Scripture text has context and background. Scripture should never be read literally or in isolation. Always seek clarification from religious scholars and teachers. In general, Scripture adheres to four principles: (1) Literal Meaning - What the Scripture says (2) Historical Setting - The story events; how the Scripture was understood in its time (3) Grammar - The surrounding sentence and paragraph; textual context (4) Synthesis - A comparison with similar Scripture to give a better contextual understanding