Luke 15

Luke
Chapter: 15
Scroll to:
Then drew near unto him all the publicans and sinners for to hear him.
And the Pharisees and scribes murmured, saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with them.
And he spake this parable unto them, saying,
What man of you, having an hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness, and go after that which is lost, until he find it?
And when he hath found it, he layeth it on his shoulders, rejoicing.
And when he cometh home, he calleth together his friends and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with me; for I have found my sheep which was lost.
I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.
Either what woman having ten pieces of silver, if she lose one piece, doth not light a candle, and sweep the house, and seek diligently till she find it?
And when she hath found it, she calleth her friends and her neighbours together, saying, Rejoice with me; for I have found the piece which I had lost.
Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.
And he said, A certain man had two sons:
And the younger of them said to his father, Father, give me the portion of goods that falleth to me. And he divided unto them his living.
And not many days after the younger son gathered all together, and took his journey into a far country, and there wasted his substance with riotous living.
And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land; and he began to be in want.
And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine.
And he would fain have filled his belly with the husks that the swine did eat: and no man gave unto him.
And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger!
I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,
And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy hired servants.
And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him.
And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son.
But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:
And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry:
For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry.
Now his elder son was in the field: and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard musick and dancing.
And he called one of the servants, and asked what these things meant.
And he said unto him, Thy brother is come; and thy father hath killed the fatted calf, because he hath received him safe and sound.
And he was angry, and would not go in: therefore came his father out, and intreated him.
And he answering said to his father, Lo, these many years do I serve thee, neither transgressed I at any time thy commandment: and yet thou never gavest me a kid, that I might make merry with my friends:
But as soon as this thy son was come, which hath devoured thy living with harlots, thou hast killed for him the fatted calf.
And he said unto him, Son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have is thine.
It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found.
Chapter:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Luke 15
  CHURCH FATHERS: 17
1. Clement of Rome | CHURCH FATHER 97 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Clement of Rome
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
2. Ignatius of Antioch | CHURCH FATHER 110 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Ignatius of Antioch
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
3. Barnabas | CHURCH FATHER 130 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Barnabas
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
4. Hermas | CHURCH FATHER 140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Hermas
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
5. Papias of Hierapolis | CHURCH FATHER 140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Papias of Hierapolis
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
6. Polycarp | CHURCH FATHER 150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Polycarp
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
7. Didache | CHURCH FATHER 150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Didache
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
8. Diognetus | CHURCH FATHER 150 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Diognetus
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
9. Justin Martyr | CHURCH FATHER 155 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Justin Martyr
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
10. Irenaeous | CHURCH FATHER 202 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Irenaeous
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
11. Clement of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER 215 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Clement of Alexandria
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
12. Tertullian | CHURCH FATHER 220 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Tertullian
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
13. Origen | CHURCH FATHER 254 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Origen
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
14. Eusebius of Caesarea | CHURCH FATHER 340 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Eusebius of Caesarea
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
15. Athanasius of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER 367 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Athanasius of Alexandria
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
16. Cyril of Jerusalem | CHURCH FATHER 386 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cyril of Jerusalem
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
17. Augustine of Hippo | CHURCH FATHER 400 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Augustine of Hippo
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 15
  BIBLE CANON: 5
A biblical canon is a set of texts (or "books") which a particular religious community regards as authoritative scripture. Christians were the first to use the term in reference to scripture.

These bible canons have developed through debate and agreement by the religious authorities.
 |  Wikipedia: Biblical_canon
1. Marcion Canon | BIBLE CANON 140 AD
Marcionism was a religious movement based on the teachings of the 2nd-century Marcion of Sinope. Marcions Canon lists 14 books out of the 27 books in the New Testament. More specifically, these were Luke and Paul's 13 writings. Marcion even rejected the entire Old Testament of 39 books.

bible.ca/marcion
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Marcion Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
2. Muratorian Canon | BIBLE CANON 170 AD
The Muratorian Canon is an ancient list of New Testament books - the oldest such list we have found and lists 22 of the 27 books that were later included in the New Testament of the Christian Bible.

It is noteworthy that the Muratorian Canon omits several epistles that later did win acceptance in the Christian New Testament such as the books of James and 2 Peter.

gotquestions.org/muratorian
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Muratorian Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
3. Apostolic Canon | BIBLE CANON 300 AD
Apostolic Canons or Ecclesiastical Canons
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Apostolic Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
4. Cheltenham/ Mommsen List | BIBLE CANON 360 AD
The Cheltenham or Mommsen List is a Latin manuscript discovered by the German classical scholar Theodor Mommsen (published 1886) which probably originated in North Africa in the 4th century.

It has 24-book Old Testament and 24-book New Testament which omits Jude and James, and perhaps Hebrews, and questions the epistles of John and Peter.

bible-researcher.com/cheltenham
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cheltenham/ Mommsen List
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
5. Council of Rome | BIBLE CANON 382 AD
The Council of Rome was a meeting of Catholic Church officials and theologians which took place in 382 under the authority of Pope Damasus I, bishop of Rome.

According to a document appended to some manuscripts, the Council of Rome affirmed the authority of the Old and New Testament canon in a decretal or damasine list.
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Council of Rome
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 15
  TEXTUAL CRITICISM
Bible Translations: Missing/Disputed Verse
Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left
  KJV - King James Bible Displayed as above
  NIV - New International Bible Missing Verse
  RSV - Revised Standard Bible Missing Verse
Textual Criticism
  Luke 1:17-9:2   Luke 9:26-14:5   Luke 15:16-24:52
The Triumphal Entry: Did Jesus request a donkey, take the donkey himself or return the donkey to its owner later? - Comparing the accounts given in Matthew 21:3, Mark 11:3, Luke 19:31 and John 12:14   callingchristians/palm-sunday
Luke 15
  VIDEO: 78
Video: Who Wrote The Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John? - Bart Ehrman 5:11
Video: In Luke 9:10, Jesus' apostles withdrew to the town  Bethsaida - HolyLandSite 7:23
Video: In Luke 10:18, I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian) 11:31
Video: Did Matthew, Mark, Luke and John actually author the Gospels? - Darrell Bock 5:09
Video: New Testament: Gospel of Luke - Dale Martin 6/23 49:16
Video: Bible Project: Luke 8:17
Video: In Luke 21:20, Jesus predicted Titus Flavius, Arch of Titus and Siege of Jerusalem 10:54
Video: John the Baptist was baptizing in the River Jordan. Were Sins forgiven? - Paul William vs Luke 30:40
Video: Forged Fiction: Gospel of Luke 7:31
Video: In Matthew 24 and Luke 21, Jesus prophecized destruction of Jewish Temple | Tovia Singer 37:39
Video: In Luke 8:45, Jesus asks who touched me. In Mark and Matthew's Gospel, why is a different account given? - Rizwan vs American Lady 10:48
Video: In Exodus 3:14, John 6:20, John 8:24, John 8:58, Mark 6:50, Mark 13:6, Luke 21:8, Matthew 14:27 and Acts 26:29 Jesus claims I AM (Ego Eimi) God - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian) 12:06
Video: Luke the Liar wrote Acts as Historical Fiction - Richard Carrier 1:10:57
Video: The 3 most questionnable Bible verses: Luke 23:44, Mark 15:38 or Matthew 27:52? - Ken Humphreys 24:01
Video: Contradictions in the Birth and Geneaology of Jesus in the gospels of Matthew and Luke - Ken Humphreys 12:06
Video: The Biblical gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John) were originally 'Nameless' Anonymous Texts - Daniel Wallace 26:58
Video: Jesus was not God according to Mark, Matthew, Luke and Apostle Paul - Karen Armstrong 1:32
Video: Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous pre-existing Texts. We do not have any Originals - Mike Licona 2:29
Video: Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong 28:13
Video: In Luke 23:34, this is a Textual Variant, a verse added to the Bible. It's a forgery so I do not preach it - James White 19:43
Video: In Luke 23:34, Father Forgive Them, this is a known forgery and later addition - James White 3:02
Video: In Luke 13:33, no Prophet will die outside Jerusalem. Yet, Jesus did? - Zakir Hussain vs James White 6:17
Video: What kind of Jew was Apostle Paul? - Luke Timothy Johnson 59:18
Video: Apostle Paul, Paganism and New Testament - Luke Timothy Johnson 3:52
Video: Was Christianity influenced by Graeco-Roman Paganism? - Luke Timothy Johnson 6:56
Video: Paganism, Christianity and Today's Christians - Luke Timothy Johnson 2:27
Video: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - Ali Ataie 59:12
Video: Gospel of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were written by anonymous Authors - Daniel Wallace 0:45
Video: Gospels were not written by Mark, Matthew, Luke or John. These names were decided 100 years later - Bart Ehrman 0:16
Video: Luke, author of Acts copies and contradicts his travelling companion, Apostle Paul - Richard Carrier 2:41
Video: John copies from Mark, Matthew and Luke and adds his own reasoning, experts agree - Richard Carrier 3:53
Video: Jesus never claimed to be divine or God-like in Matthew, Mark or Luke - Bart Ehrman 0:36
Video: Mark, Matthew, Luke and John could not read or write. Who wrote the Gospels? - Bart Ehrman 1:09
Video: Mark, Matthew, Luke and John have too many differences and contradictions - Bart Ehrman 2:27
Video: 95% of our Jesus birth narrative comes from Luke - John Dominic Crossan 1:17
Video: Mark, Matthew, Luke, John... Where's the other Gospels, Acts and Epistles? - Bart Ehrman 3:22
Video: Matthew, Mark and Luke are similar and different. Were the Gospel differences 'inspired' by God? - Bart Ehrman 1:22
Video: Mark was copied by Matthew and Luke - Bart Ehrman 0:26
Video: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are NOT objective, historically accurate accounts of Jesus' life - Bart Ehrman 0:45
Video: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are written by Anonymous Authors in third-person (i.e. they) - Bart Ehrman 2:06
Video: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John authored by highly-educated, literate, 2nd gen. Greek speakers - Bart Ehrman 2:29
Video: On Jesus' birth, Matthew and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman 8:02
Video: On Jesus' death, Mark and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman 3:44
Video: Luke's Gospel depicts Jesus as a prophet with a universal message, rejected by his people - Bart Ehrman 3:07
Video: Luke Gospel, a 14th century manuscript (109) proves a scribe incorrectly copied Jesus' geneology - Bart Ehrman 1:54
Video: If Mark's Gospel was based on eyewitness', why did Matthew & Luke 'radically' edit it? - Bart Ehrman 0:41
Video: Irenaeus (180 AD) named popular, 'anonymous' texts Mark, Matthew, Luke, John for Apostolic reasons - Bart Ehrman 1:37
Video: Matthew and Luke 'revised' the order of historical events copied from Mark's Gospel - Richard Bauckham 1:12
Video: If Matthew and Luke revised Mark, what about the earlier 'unchecked' Oral tradition? - Bart Ehrman 1:02
Video: Mark, Matthew, Luke or John do not give eyewitness' names or their sources - Richard Carrier 0:57
Video: Jesus in Luke's Gospel plagarized from Elijah-Elisha in 1 Kings - Richard Carrier 1:55
Video: In Luke, the stories of Jesus-Temple and Jesus-Emeous bear striking similarities - Richard Carrier 2:11
Video: In Luke 16:20, Lazarus is fiction. John makes Lazarus into a real, dying/rising person - Richard Carrier 4:06
Video: On the Gospel writers: Matthew copied Mark, Luke copied Matthew and Mark, John copied Luke - Richard Carrier 2:40
Video: In Luke 11:2, the 'Lords Prayer' was probably elongated by later Scribes - Bruce Metzger 1:33
Video: On Luke 17:34, KJV translators added 'Men'. Earliest Greek Bible manuscripts have no 'Men' - Bruce Metzger 2:00
Video: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John do not compliment each other, but are 'competitive' - Charles Hedrick 0:36
Video: Mark, Matthew & Luke write of Jesus a mythical Jewish Man who did 'mighty deeds' - Charles Hedrick 1:36
Video: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John are 4 Gospels. Their are 34 more Gospels - Charles Hedrick 1:25
Video: Mark, Matthew, Luke, John are anonymous texts named later (false ascriptions) - Bart Ehrman 1:11
Video: After 100 years, Church Fathers refered to gospels as Matthew, Mark, Luke & John - Bart Ehrman 0:38
Video: Mark is the most reliable Gospel. Matthew, Luke and John are later 'corrections' of Mark - Godless Engineer 7:10
Video: In Luke 11:2, Jesus taught his disciples the Lord's Prayer, not Trinity - Muhammad Lamin 13:09
Video: In Luke 24:19, Jesus of Nazareth is called a man who was a 'Jewish Prophet' - Muhammad Lamin 8:25
Video: Gospel of Luke. Says who? (Comedy Anime) 14:50
Video: In Luke 1:35, Jesus is 'Son of God', not God, not Trinity - Anthony Buzzard 3:02
Video: In Luke 1:3, Luke was 'inspired' by other writings, and so he decided to write too - Mansur Ahmad vs Man 1:11:46
Video: Jesus became the Passover Lamb in John's Gospel, not Mark, Matthew or Luke - Tovia Singer 3:55
Video: 2:28
Video: 6:42
Video: 8:41
Video: 4:25
Video: 3:30
Video: Are the Gospels historically reliable? - Bart Ehrman vs Peter J Williams 1:21
Video: Are the Gospels historically reliable? - Bart Ehrman vs Peter J Williams 3:26
Video: Tour of Syria, defying travel advice | Luke Damant 45:14
Video: Walking Tour lost in Assad's Syria with local girl | Luke Damant 40:30
Video: Local girl shows me destroyed Damascus, Syria
| Luke Damant 46:23
29448 views · 3 days ago


IMPORTANT: All Scripture text has context and background. Scripture should never be read literally or in isolation. Always seek clarification from religious scholars and teachers. In general, Scripture adheres to four principles: (1) Literal Meaning - What the Scripture says (2) Historical Setting - The story events; how the Scripture was understood in its time (3) Grammar - The surrounding sentence and paragraph; textual context (4) Synthesis - A comparison with similar Scripture to give a better contextual understanding

About  |  Help  |  Contact    •    Terms  |  Privacy  |  Disclaimer
Connect:      Facebook  |    Twitter  |    Youtube