Luke
Chapter: 15
Then drew near unto him all the publicans and sinners for to hear him.
6 of 32
And the Pharisees and scribes murmured, saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with them.
7 of 32
And he spake this parable unto them, saying,
8 of 32
What man of you, having an hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness, and go after that which is lost, until he find it?
9 of 32
And when he hath found it, he layeth it on his shoulders, rejoicing.
10 of 32
And when he cometh home, he calleth together his friends and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with me; for I have found my sheep which was lost.
11 of 32
I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.
12 of 32
Either what woman having ten pieces of silver, if she lose one piece, doth not light a candle, and sweep the house, and seek diligently till she find it?
13 of 32
And when she hath found it, she calleth her friends and her neighbours together, saying, Rejoice with me; for I have found the piece which I had lost.
14 of 32
Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.
15 of 32
And he said, A certain man had two sons:
16 of 32
And the younger of them said to his father, Father, give me the portion of goods that falleth to me. And he divided unto them his living.
17 of 32
And not many days after the younger son gathered all together, and took his journey into a far country, and there wasted his substance with riotous living.
18 of 32
And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land; and he began to be in want.
19 of 32
And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine.
20 of 32
And he would fain have filled his belly with the husks that the swine did eat: and no man gave unto him.
21 of 32
And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger!
22 of 32
I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,
23 of 32
And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy hired servants.
24 of 32
And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him.
25 of 32
And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son.
26 of 32
But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:
27 of 32
And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry:
28 of 32
For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry.
29 of 32
Now his elder son was in the field: and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard musick and dancing.
30 of 32
And he called one of the servants, and asked what these things meant.
31 of 32
And he said unto him, Thy brother is come; and thy father hath killed the fatted calf, because he hath received him safe and sound.
32 of 32
And he was angry, and would not go in: therefore came his father out, and intreated him.
33 of 32
And he answering said to his father, Lo, these many years do I serve thee, neither transgressed I at any time thy commandment: and yet thou never gavest me a kid, that I might make merry with my friends:
34 of 32
But as soon as this thy son was come, which hath devoured thy living with harlots, thou hast killed for him the fatted calf.
35 of 32
And he said unto him, Son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have is thine.
36 of 32
It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found.
37 of 32
Luke 15
CHURCH FATHERS: 17
1. Clement of Rome | CHURCH FATHER
97 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Clement of Rome
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
2. Ignatius of Antioch | CHURCH FATHER
110 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Ignatius of Antioch
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
3. Barnabas | CHURCH FATHER
130 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Barnabas
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
4. Hermas | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Hermas
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
5. Papias of Hierapolis | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Papias of Hierapolis
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
6. Polycarp | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Polycarp
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
7. Didache | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Didache
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
8. Diognetus | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Diognetus
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
9. Justin Martyr | CHURCH FATHER
155 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Justin Martyr
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
10. Irenaeous | CHURCH FATHER
202 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Irenaeous
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
11. Clement of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
215 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Clement of Alexandria
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
12. Tertullian | CHURCH FATHER
220 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Tertullian
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
13. Origen | CHURCH FATHER
254 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Origen
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
14. Eusebius of Caesarea | CHURCH FATHER
340 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Eusebius of Caesarea
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
15. Athanasius of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
367 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Athanasius of Alexandria
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
16. Cyril of Jerusalem | CHURCH FATHER
386 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cyril of Jerusalem
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
17. Augustine of Hippo | CHURCH FATHER
400 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Augustine of Hippo
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 15
BIBLE CANON: 5
A biblical canon is a set of texts (or "books") which a particular religious community regards as authoritative scripture. Christians were the first to use the term in reference to scripture.
These bible canons have developed through debate and agreement by the religious authorities.
1. Marcion Canon | BIBLE CANON
140 AD
Marcionism was a religious movement based on the teachings of the 2nd-century Marcion of Sinope. Marcions Canon lists 14 books out of the 27 books in the New Testament. More specifically, these were Luke and Paul's 13 writings. Marcion even rejected the entire Old Testament of 39 books.
bible.ca/marcion
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Marcion Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
2. Muratorian Canon | BIBLE CANON
170 AD
The Muratorian Canon is an ancient list of New Testament books - the oldest such list we have found and lists 22 of the 27 books that were later included in the New Testament of the Christian Bible.
It is noteworthy that the Muratorian Canon omits several epistles that later did win acceptance in the Christian New Testament such as the books of James and 2 Peter.
gotquestions.org/muratorian
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Muratorian Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
3. Apostolic Canon | BIBLE CANON
300 AD
Apostolic Canons or Ecclesiastical Canons
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Apostolic Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
4. Cheltenham/ Mommsen List | BIBLE CANON
360 AD
The Cheltenham or Mommsen List is a Latin manuscript discovered by the German classical scholar Theodor Mommsen (published 1886) which probably originated in North Africa in the 4th century.
It has 24-book Old Testament and 24-book New Testament which omits Jude and James, and perhaps Hebrews, and questions the epistles of John and Peter.
bible-researcher.com/cheltenham
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cheltenham/ Mommsen List
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
5. Council of Rome | BIBLE CANON
382 AD
The Council of Rome was a meeting of Catholic Church officials and theologians which took place in 382 under the authority of Pope Damasus I, bishop of Rome.
According to a document appended to some manuscripts, the Council of Rome affirmed the authority of the Old and New Testament canon in a decretal or damasine list.
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Council of Rome
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 15
TEXTUAL CRITICISM
Luke 15
VIDEO: 79
5:11
9185 views · 3 mins ago |
8 years ago
1 of 79
9185
1456185600
1711711768
Who Wrote The Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John? - Bart Ehrman
000311
1
7:23
4125 views · 6 mins ago |
7 years ago
2 of 79
4125
1482796800
1711711591
In Luke 9:10, Jesus' apostles withdrew to the town Bethsaida - HolyLandSite
000443
2
11:31
7289 views · 7 mins ago |
7 years ago
3 of 79
7289
1482796800
1711711497
In Luke 10:18, I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000691
3
8:45
2008 views · 2 days ago |
7 years ago
4 of 79
2008
1490659200
1711560930
Jesus feeding 5,000 and contradictions between Mark and Luke's account - Mike Licona
000525
4
5:09
5778 views · 2 mins ago |
7 years ago
5 of 79
5778
1493856000
1711711829
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke and John actually author the Gospels? - Darrell Bock
000309
5
49:16
4296 views · 2 mins ago |
7 years ago
6 of 79
4296
1493856000
1711711799
New Testament: Gospel of Luke - Dale Martin 6/23
002956
6
8:17
2897 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
7 of 79
2897
1493856000
1711706977
Bible Project: Luke
000497
7
10:54
7248 views · 5 hrs ago |
7 years ago
8 of 79
7248
1501545600
1711695715
In Luke 21:20, Jesus predicted Titus Flavius, Arch of Titus and Siege of Jerusalem
000654
8
30:40
2861 views · 1 day ago |
7 years ago
9 of 79
2861
1501545600
1711599833
John the Baptist was baptizing in the River Jordan. Were Sins forgiven? - Paul William vs Luke
001840
9
7:31
4103 views · 3 mins ago |
7 years ago
10 of 79
4103
1501545600
1711711791
Forged Fiction: Gospel of Luke
000451
10
37:39
4845 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
11 of 79
4845
1501545600
1711706626
In Matthew 24 and Luke 21, Jesus prophecized destruction of Jewish Temple. But, Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous Texts written AFTER the Event - Tovia Singer
002259
11
39:01
4162 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
12 of 79
4162
1501545600
1711699693
Darwin left Gradualism as a 'falsification test' for his Dawinian Theory - Suboor Ahmad vs Agnostic Luke
002341
12
10:48
7536 views · 3 mins ago |
7 years ago
13 of 79
7536
1501894583
1711711750
In Luke 8:45, Jesus asks who touched me. In Mark and Matthew's Gospel, why is a different account given? - Rizwan vs American Lady
000648
13
12:06
22338 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
14 of 79
22338
1505259041
1711707103
In Exodus 3:14, John 6:20, John 8:24, John 8:58, Mark 6:50, Mark 13:6, Luke 21:8, Matthew 14:27 and Acts 26:29 Jesus claims I AM (Ego Eimi) God - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000726
14
1:10:57
2948 views · 1 day ago |
6 years ago
15 of 79
2948
1507658044
1711612553
Luke the Liar wrote Acts as Historical Fiction - Richard Carrier
004257
15
24:01
7661 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
16 of 79
7661
1510767852
1711688977
The 3 most questionnable Bible verses: Luke 23:44, Mark 15:38 or Matthew 27:52? - Ken Humphreys
001441
16
12:06
4338 views · 41 secs ago |
6 years ago
17 of 79
4338
1510817351
1711711900
Contradictions in the Birth and Geneaology of Jesus in the gospels of Matthew and Luke - Ken Humphreys
000726
17
26:58
6065 views · 1 min ago |
6 years ago
18 of 79
6065
1511300162
1711711876
The Biblical gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John) were originally 'Nameless' Anonymous Texts - Daniel Wallace
001618
18
1:32
4097 views · 53 mins ago |
6 years ago
19 of 79
4097
1512437630
1711708749
Jesus was not God according to Mark, Matthew, Luke and Apostle Paul - Karen Armstrong
000092
19
2:29
1907 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
20 of 79
1907
1512438067
1711683652
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous pre-existing Texts. We do not have any Originals - Mike Licona
000149
20
28:13
5602 views · 2 mins ago |
6 years ago
21 of 79
5602
1512501625
1711711839
Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong
001693
21
19:43
2488 views · 16 hrs ago |
6 years ago
22 of 79
2488
1514607045
1711653214
In Luke 23:34, this is a Textual Variant, a verse added to the Bible. It's a forgery so I do not preach it - James White
001183
22
3:02
2593 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
23 of 79
2593
1515884443
1711702882
In Luke 23:34, Father Forgive Them, this is a known forgery and later addition - James White
000182
23
6:17
7004 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
24 of 79
7004
1515887553
1711698688
In Luke 13:33, no Prophet will die outside Jerusalem. Yet, Jesus did? - Zakir Hussain vs James White
000377
24
59:18
3255 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
25 of 79
3255
1516193779
1711702308
What kind of Jew was Apostle Paul? - Luke Timothy Johnson
003558
25
3:52
5927 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
26 of 79
5927
1516193776
1711700896
Apostle Paul, Paganism and New Testament - Luke Timothy Johnson
000232
26
6:56
4379 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
27 of 79
4379
1516193676
1711700156
Was Christianity influenced by Graeco-Roman Paganism? - Luke Timothy Johnson
000416
27
2:27
2915 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
28 of 79
2915
1516193676
1711707671
Paganism, Christianity and Today's Christians - Luke Timothy Johnson
000147
28
59:12
3097 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
29 of 79
3097
1523592047
1711698701
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - Ali Ataie
003552
29
0:45
5012 views · 4 mins ago |
6 years ago
30 of 79
5012
1526689243
1711711726
Gospel of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were written by anonymous Authors - Daniel Wallace
000045
30
0:16
7091 views · 3 mins ago |
6 years ago
31 of 79
7091
1529106416
1711711783
Gospels were not written by Mark, Matthew, Luke or John. These names were decided 100 years later - Bart Ehrman
000016
31
2:41
3065 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
32 of 79
3065
1529281401
1711695843
Luke, author of Acts copies and contradicts his travelling companion, Apostle Paul - Richard Carrier
000161
32
3:53
2898 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
33 of 79
2898
1529281428
1711702580
John copies from Mark, Matthew and Luke and adds his own reasoning, experts agree - Richard Carrier
000233
33
0:36
3120 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
34 of 79
3120
1529332033
1711704784
Jesus never claimed to be divine or God-like in Matthew, Mark or Luke - Bart Ehrman
000036
34
1:09
6910 views · 4 mins ago |
6 years ago
35 of 79
6910
1529332023
1711711712
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John could not read or write. Who wrote the Gospels? - Bart Ehrman
000069
35
2:27
2634 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
36 of 79
2634
1529332027
1711687136
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John have too many differences and contradictions - Bart Ehrman
000147
36
1:17
2464 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
37 of 79
2464
1529776893
1711682370
95% of our Jesus birth narrative comes from Luke - John Dominic Crossan
000077
37
3:22
6415 views · 4 mins ago |
6 years ago
38 of 79
6415
1529793131
1711711721
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John... Where's the other Gospels, Acts and Epistles? - Bart Ehrman
000202
38
1:22
6213 views · 3 mins ago |
6 years ago
39 of 79
6213
1530141496
1711711733
Matthew, Mark and Luke are similar and different. Were the Gospel differences 'inspired' by God? - Bart Ehrman
000082
39
0:26
3209 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
40 of 79
3209
1530141495
1711701558
Mark was copied by Matthew and Luke - Bart Ehrman
000026
40
0:45
2860 views · 16 hrs ago |
6 years ago
41 of 79
2860
1530141509
1711655848
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are NOT objective, historically accurate accounts of Jesus' life - Bart Ehrman
000045
41
2:06
3064 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
42 of 79
3064
1530142882
1711707520
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are written by Anonymous Authors in third-person (i.e. they) - Bart Ehrman
000126
42
2:29
3625 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
43 of 79
3625
1530142891
1711690995
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John authored by highly-educated, literate, 2nd gen. Greek speakers - Bart Ehrman
000149
43
8:02
2637 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
44 of 79
2637
1530142905
1711706180
On Jesus' birth, Matthew and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000482
44
3:44
3403 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
45 of 79
3403
1530143088
1711699167
On Jesus' death, Mark and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000224
45
3:07
5407 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
46 of 79
5407
1530143053
1711706239
Luke's Gospel depicts Jesus as a prophet with a universal message, rejected by his people - Bart Ehrman
000187
46
1:54
6100 views · 3 mins ago |
6 years ago
47 of 79
6100
1530143044
1711711742
Luke Gospel, a 14th century manuscript (109) proves a scribe incorrectly copied Jesus' geneology - Bart Ehrman
000114
47
0:41
5046 views · 3 mins ago |
6 years ago
48 of 79
5046
1530742149
1711711745
If Mark's Gospel was based on eyewitness', why did Matthew & Luke 'radically' edit it? - Bart Ehrman
000041
48
1:37
4914 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
49 of 79
4914
1530742143
1711689725
Irenaeus (180 AD) named popular, 'anonymous' texts Mark, Matthew, Luke, John for Apostolic reasons - Bart Ehrman
000097
49
1:12
4112 views · 44 secs ago |
6 years ago
50 of 79
4112
1530742285
1711711897
Matthew and Luke 'revised' the order of historical events copied from Mark's Gospel - Richard Bauckham
000072
50
1:02
2951 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
51 of 79
2951
1530742021
1711707598
If Matthew and Luke revised Mark, what about the earlier 'unchecked' Oral tradition? - Bart Ehrman
000062
51
0:57
2129 views · 16 hrs ago |
6 years ago
52 of 79
2129
1531349688
1711654548
Mark, Matthew, Luke or John do not give eyewitness' names or their sources - Richard Carrier
000057
52
1:55
4028 views · 4 mins ago |
6 years ago
53 of 79
4028
1531338369
1711711698
Jesus in Luke's Gospel plagarized from Elijah-Elisha in 1 Kings - Richard Carrier
000115
53
2:11
1816 views · 14 hrs ago |
6 years ago
54 of 79
1816
1531350464
1711661265
In Luke, the stories of Jesus-Temple and Jesus-Emeous bear striking similarities - Richard Carrier
000131
54
4:06
5249 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
55 of 79
5249
1531349897
1711699445
In Luke 16:20, Lazarus is fiction. John makes Lazarus into a real, dying/rising person - Richard Carrier
000246
55
2:40
7587 views · 2 mins ago |
6 years ago
56 of 79
7587
1531349897
1711711794
On the Gospel writers: Matthew copied Mark, Luke copied Matthew and Mark, John copied Luke - Richard Carrier
000160
56
1:33
2577 views · 12 hrs ago |
6 years ago
57 of 79
2577
1531551571
1711669469
In Luke 11:2, the 'Lords Prayer' was probably elongated by later Scribes - Bruce Metzger
000093
57
2:00
5092 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
58 of 79
5092
1531555781
1711706802
On Luke 17:34, KJV translators added 'Men'. Earliest Greek Bible manuscripts have no 'Men' - Bruce Metzger
000120
58
0:36
2997 views · 14 hrs ago |
6 years ago
59 of 79
2997
1532037755
1711660491
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John do not compliment each other, but are 'competitive' - Charles Hedrick
000036
59
1:36
3385 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
60 of 79
3385
1532037762
1711707717
Mark, Matthew & Luke write of Jesus a mythical Jewish Man who did 'mighty deeds' - Charles Hedrick
000096
60
1:25
6046 views · 2 mins ago |
6 years ago
61 of 79
6046
1532147216
1711711815
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John are 4 Gospels. Their are 34 more Gospels - Charles Hedrick
000085
61
1:11
3151 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
62 of 79
3151
1533831758
1711676096
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John are anonymous texts named later (false ascriptions) - Bart Ehrman
000071
62
0:38
10531 views · 4 mins ago |
6 years ago
63 of 79
10531
1533564004
1711711703
After 100 years, Church Fathers refered to gospels as Matthew, Mark, Luke & John - Bart Ehrman
000038
63
7:10
4141 views · 1 min ago |
5 years ago
64 of 79
4141
1542651448
1711711859
Mark is the most reliable Gospel. Matthew, Luke and John are later 'corrections' of Mark - Godless Engineer
000430
64
13:11
5517 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
65 of 79
5517
1547044666
1711699539
In Luke 10:18 and Acts 9:3, both Jesus and Apostle Paul saw 'flash of brightness'. Did they see Satan? - Jeffrey Daugherty
000791
65
13:09
3376 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
66 of 79
3376
1548092471
1711699591
In Luke 11:2, Jesus taught his disciples the Lord's Prayer, not Trinity - Muhammad Lamin
000789
66
8:25
4045 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
67 of 79
4045
1548093914
1711699608
In Luke 24:19, Jesus of Nazareth is called a man who was a 'Jewish Prophet' - Muhammad Lamin
000505
67
14:50
2835 views · 3 mins ago |
5 years ago
68 of 79
2835
1549213440
1711711787
Gospel of Luke. Says who? (Comedy Anime)
000890
68
3:02
4110 views · 1 hr ago |
5 years ago
69 of 79
4110
1549453760
1711707226
In Luke 1:35, Jesus is 'Son of God', not God, not Trinity - Anthony Buzzard
000182
69
1:11:46
3212 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
70 of 79
3212
1559006507
1711693572
In Luke 1:3, Luke was 'inspired' by other writings, and so he decided to write too - Mansur Ahmad vs Man
004306
70
3:55
6339 views · 1 min ago |
5 years ago
71 of 79
6339
1559259700
1711711881
Jesus became the Passover Lamb in John's Gospel, not Mark, Matthew or Luke - Tovia Singer
000235
71
2:28
5396 views · 3 mins ago |
5 years ago
72 of 79
5396
1566862429
1711711778
John's Gospel is different from Mark, Matthew and Luke due to emerging Gnostic ideas - Kegan Chandler
000148
72
6:42
3879 views · 26 mins ago |
4 years ago
73 of 79
3879
1570024798
1711710366
Was the 'fake' Jesus' Resurrection in Mark 9-20 copied by Matthew, Luke and John? - TruthSurge
000402
73
8:41
4057 views · 2 mins ago |
4 years ago
74 of 79
4057
1570025788
1711711849
Gospel of Luke: 14% Reliability Score against 'US Federal Rules' - TruthSurge
000521
74
5:52
3353 views · 1 hr ago |
4 years ago
75 of 79
3353
1570734745
1711706637
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John & Apostle Paul are not real, Historical men, but Literary fictitious characters - Joseph Atwill
000352
75
4:25
4375 views · 1 min ago |
4 years ago
76 of 79
4375
1570804850
1711711853
Jesus of Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John was a Jew - Adele Reinhartz
000265
76
3:30
7994 views · 1 min ago |
4 years ago
77 of 79
7994
1571010245
1711711865
Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke, John disagreed over Torah, Jewish Law & Gentiles - Richard Carrier
000210
77
1:21
4057 views · 55 secs ago |
4 years ago
78 of 79
4057
1572279402
1711711886
Matthew and Luke copied from Gospel of Mark - Bart Ehrman
000081
78
3:26
4183 views · 2 mins ago |
4 years ago
79 of 79
4183
1572279411
1711711805
Gospel Authors of Luke and Acts are Anonymous and Unknown - Bart Ehrman
000206
79
22008 views · 0 secs ago
IMPORTANT: All Scripture text has context and background. Scripture should never be read literally or in isolation. Always seek clarification from religious scholars and teachers. In general, Scripture adheres to four principles: (1) Literal Meaning - What the Scripture says (2) Historical Setting - The story events; how the Scripture was understood in its time (3) Grammar - The surrounding sentence and paragraph; textual context (4) Synthesis - A comparison with similar Scripture to give a better contextual understanding