Luke
Chapter: 14
And it came to pass, as he went into the house of one of the chief Pharisees to eat bread on the sabbath day, that they watched him.
6 of 35
And, behold, there was a certain man before him which had the dropsy.
7 of 35
And Jesus answering spake unto the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day?
8 of 35
And they held their peace. And he took him, and healed him, and let him go;
9 of 35
And answered them, saying, Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the sabbath day?
10 of 35
And they could not answer him again to these things.
11 of 35
And he put forth a parable to those which were bidden, when he marked how they chose out the chief rooms; saying unto them,
12 of 35
When thou art bidden of any man to a wedding, sit not down in the highest room; lest a more honourable man than thou be bidden of him;
13 of 35
And he that bade thee and him come and say to thee, Give this man place; and thou begin with shame to take the lowest room.
14 of 35
But when thou art bidden, go and sit down in the lowest room; that when he that bade thee cometh, he may say unto thee, Friend, go up higher: then shalt thou have worship in the presence of them that sit at meat with thee.
15 of 35
For whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.
16 of 35
Then said he also to him that bade him, When thou makest a dinner or a supper, call not thy friends, nor thy brethren, neither thy kinsmen, nor thy rich neighbours; lest they also bid thee again, and a recompence be made thee.
17 of 35
But when thou makest a feast, call the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind:
18 of 35
And thou shalt be blessed; for they cannot recompense thee: for thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just.
19 of 35
And when one of them that sat at meat with him heard these things, he said unto him, Blessed is he that shall eat bread in the kingdom of God.
20 of 35
Then said he unto him, A certain man made a great supper, and bade many:
21 of 35
And sent his servant at supper time to say to them that were bidden, Come; for all things are now ready.
22 of 35
And they all with one consent began to make excuse. The first said unto him, I have bought a piece of ground, and I must needs go and see it: I pray thee have me excused.
23 of 35
And another said, I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I go to prove them: I pray thee have me excused.
24 of 35
And another said, I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come.
25 of 35
So that servant came, and shewed his lord these things. Then the master of the house being angry said to his servant, Go out quickly into the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in hither the poor, and the maimed, and the halt, and the blind.
26 of 35
And the servant said, Lord, it is done as thou hast commanded, and yet there is room.
27 of 35
And the lord said unto the servant, Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled.
28 of 35
For I say unto you, That none of those men which were bidden shall taste of my supper.
29 of 35
And there went great multitudes with him: and he turned, and said unto them,
30 of 35
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
31 of 35
And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.
32 of 35
For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it?
33 of 35
Lest haply, after he hath laid the foundation, and is not able to finish it, all that behold it begin to mock him,
34 of 35
Saying, This man began to build, and was not able to finish.
35 of 35
Or what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand?
36 of 35
Or else, while the other is yet a great way off, he sendeth an ambassage, and desireth conditions of peace.
37 of 35
So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.
38 of 35
Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be seasoned?
39 of 35
It is neither fit for the land, nor yet for the dunghill; but men cast it out. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.
40 of 35
Luke 14
CHURCH FATHERS: 17
1. Clement of Rome | CHURCH FATHER
97 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Clement of Rome
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
2. Ignatius of Antioch | CHURCH FATHER
110 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Ignatius of Antioch
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
3. Barnabas | CHURCH FATHER
130 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Barnabas
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
4. Hermas | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Hermas
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
5. Papias of Hierapolis | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Papias of Hierapolis
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
6. Polycarp | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Polycarp
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
7. Didache | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Didache
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
8. Diognetus | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Luke was REJECTED (0%) by Diognetus
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
9. Justin Martyr | CHURCH FATHER
155 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Justin Martyr
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
10. Irenaeous | CHURCH FATHER
202 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Irenaeous
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
11. Clement of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
215 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Clement of Alexandria
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
12. Tertullian | CHURCH FATHER
220 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Tertullian
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
13. Origen | CHURCH FATHER
254 AD
Luke was APPROVED (75%) by Origen
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
14. Eusebius of Caesarea | CHURCH FATHER
340 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Eusebius of Caesarea
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
15. Athanasius of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
367 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Athanasius of Alexandria
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
16. Cyril of Jerusalem | CHURCH FATHER
386 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cyril of Jerusalem
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
17. Augustine of Hippo | CHURCH FATHER
400 AD
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Augustine of Hippo
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 14
BIBLE CANON: 5
A biblical canon is a set of texts (or "books") which a particular religious community regards as authoritative scripture. Christians were the first to use the term in reference to scripture.
These bible canons have developed through debate and agreement by the religious authorities.
1. Marcion Canon | BIBLE CANON
140 AD
Marcionism was a religious movement based on the teachings of the 2nd-century Marcion of Sinope. Marcions Canon lists 14 books out of the 27 books in the New Testament. More specifically, these were Luke and Paul's 13 writings. Marcion even rejected the entire Old Testament of 39 books.
bible.ca/marcion
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Marcion Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
2. Muratorian Canon | BIBLE CANON
170 AD
The Muratorian Canon is an ancient list of New Testament books - the oldest such list we have found and lists 22 of the 27 books that were later included in the New Testament of the Christian Bible.
It is noteworthy that the Muratorian Canon omits several epistles that later did win acceptance in the Christian New Testament such as the books of James and 2 Peter.
gotquestions.org/muratorian
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Muratorian Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
3. Apostolic Canon | BIBLE CANON
300 AD
Apostolic Canons or Ecclesiastical Canons
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Apostolic Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
4. Cheltenham/ Mommsen List | BIBLE CANON
360 AD
The Cheltenham or Mommsen List is a Latin manuscript discovered by the German classical scholar Theodor Mommsen (published 1886) which probably originated in North Africa in the 4th century.
It has 24-book Old Testament and 24-book New Testament which omits Jude and James, and perhaps Hebrews, and questions the epistles of John and Peter.
bible-researcher.com/cheltenham
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cheltenham/ Mommsen List
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
5. Council of Rome | BIBLE CANON
382 AD
The Council of Rome was a meeting of Catholic Church officials and theologians which took place in 382 under the authority of Pope Damasus I, bishop of Rome.
According to a document appended to some manuscripts, the Council of Rome affirmed the authority of the Old and New Testament canon in a decretal or damasine list.
Luke was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Council of Rome
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Luke 14
TEXTUAL CRITICISM
Luke 14
VIDEO: 79
5:11
9183 views · 10 hrs ago |
8 years ago
1 of 79
9183
1456185600
1711656580
Who Wrote The Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John? - Bart Ehrman
000311
1
7:23
4123 views · 14 hrs ago |
7 years ago
2 of 79
4123
1482796800
1711640681
In Luke 9:10, Jesus' apostles withdrew to the town Bethsaida - HolyLandSite
000443
2
11:31
7287 views · 15 hrs ago |
7 years ago
3 of 79
7287
1482796800
1711635577
In Luke 10:18, I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000691
3
8:45
2008 views · 2 days ago |
7 years ago
4 of 79
2008
1490659200
1711560930
Jesus feeding 5,000 and contradictions between Mark and Luke's account - Mike Licona
000525
4
5:09
5777 views · 15 hrs ago |
7 years ago
5 of 79
5777
1493856000
1711638374
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke and John actually author the Gospels? - Darrell Bock
000309
5
49:16
4295 views · 8 hrs ago |
7 years ago
6 of 79
4295
1493856000
1711663744
New Testament: Gospel of Luke - Dale Martin 6/23
002956
6
8:17
2896 views · 42 mins ago |
7 years ago
7 of 79
2896
1493856000
1711688594
Bible Project: Luke
000497
7
10:54
7247 views · 25 mins ago |
7 years ago
8 of 79
7247
1501545600
1711689636
In Luke 21:20, Jesus predicted Titus Flavius, Arch of Titus and Siege of Jerusalem
000654
8
30:40
2861 views · 1 day ago |
7 years ago
9 of 79
2861
1501545600
1711599833
John the Baptist was baptizing in the River Jordan. Were Sins forgiven? - Paul William vs Luke
001840
9
7:31
4102 views · 18 hrs ago |
7 years ago
10 of 79
4102
1501545600
1711625354
Forged Fiction: Gospel of Luke
000451
10
37:39
4844 views · 8 hrs ago |
7 years ago
11 of 79
4844
1501545600
1711661536
In Matthew 24 and Luke 21, Jesus prophecized destruction of Jewish Temple. But, Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous Texts written AFTER the Event - Tovia Singer
002259
11
39:01
4160 views · 41 mins ago |
7 years ago
12 of 79
4160
1501545600
1711688661
Darwin left Gradualism as a 'falsification test' for his Dawinian Theory - Suboor Ahmad vs Agnostic Luke
002341
12
10:48
7535 views · 7 hrs ago |
7 years ago
13 of 79
7535
1501894583
1711666666
In Luke 8:45, Jesus asks who touched me. In Mark and Matthew's Gospel, why is a different account given? - Rizwan vs American Lady
000648
13
12:06
22335 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
14 of 79
22335
1505259041
1711687354
In Exodus 3:14, John 6:20, John 8:24, John 8:58, Mark 6:50, Mark 13:6, Luke 21:8, Matthew 14:27 and Acts 26:29 Jesus claims I AM (Ego Eimi) God - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000726
14
1:10:57
2948 views · 22 hrs ago |
6 years ago
15 of 79
2948
1507658044
1711612553
Luke the Liar wrote Acts as Historical Fiction - Richard Carrier
004257
15
24:01
7661 views · 36 mins ago |
6 years ago
16 of 79
7661
1510767852
1711688977
The 3 most questionnable Bible verses: Luke 23:44, Mark 15:38 or Matthew 27:52? - Ken Humphreys
001441
16
12:06
4337 views · 36 mins ago |
6 years ago
17 of 79
4337
1510817351
1711688981
Contradictions in the Birth and Geneaology of Jesus in the gospels of Matthew and Luke - Ken Humphreys
000726
17
26:58
6062 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
18 of 79
6062
1511300162
1711678001
The Biblical gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John) were originally 'Nameless' Anonymous Texts - Daniel Wallace
001618
18
1:32
4095 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
19 of 79
4095
1512437630
1711680887
Jesus was not God according to Mark, Matthew, Luke and Apostle Paul - Karen Armstrong
000092
19
2:29
1907 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
20 of 79
1907
1512438067
1711683652
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous pre-existing Texts. We do not have any Originals - Mike Licona
000149
20
28:13
5599 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
21 of 79
5599
1512501625
1711673708
Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong
001693
21
19:43
2488 views · 11 hrs ago |
6 years ago
22 of 79
2488
1514607045
1711653214
In Luke 23:34, this is a Textual Variant, a verse added to the Bible. It's a forgery so I do not preach it - James White
001183
22
3:02
2592 views · 12 hrs ago |
6 years ago
23 of 79
2592
1515884443
1711647423
In Luke 23:34, Father Forgive Them, this is a known forgery and later addition - James White
000182
23
6:17
7002 views · 23 mins ago |
6 years ago
24 of 79
7002
1515887553
1711689712
In Luke 13:33, no Prophet will die outside Jerusalem. Yet, Jesus did? - Zakir Hussain vs James White
000377
24
59:18
3253 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
25 of 79
3253
1516193779
1711679731
What kind of Jew was Apostle Paul? - Luke Timothy Johnson
003558
25
3:52
5922 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
26 of 79
5922
1516193776
1711680965
Apostle Paul, Paganism and New Testament - Luke Timothy Johnson
000232
26
6:56
4376 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
27 of 79
4376
1516193676
1711683648
Was Christianity influenced by Graeco-Roman Paganism? - Luke Timothy Johnson
000416
27
2:27
2912 views · 12 hrs ago |
6 years ago
28 of 79
2912
1516193676
1711648975
Paganism, Christianity and Today's Christians - Luke Timothy Johnson
000147
28
59:12
3096 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
29 of 79
3096
1523592047
1711656330
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - Ali Ataie
003552
29
0:45
5009 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
30 of 79
5009
1526689243
1711662227
Gospel of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were written by anonymous Authors - Daniel Wallace
000045
30
0:16
7089 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
31 of 79
7089
1529106416
1711667003
Gospels were not written by Mark, Matthew, Luke or John. These names were decided 100 years later - Bart Ehrman
000016
31
2:41
3064 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
32 of 79
3064
1529281401
1711680795
Luke, author of Acts copies and contradicts his travelling companion, Apostle Paul - Richard Carrier
000161
32
3:53
2897 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
33 of 79
2897
1529281428
1711687469
John copies from Mark, Matthew and Luke and adds his own reasoning, experts agree - Richard Carrier
000233
33
0:36
3118 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
34 of 79
3118
1529332033
1711656522
Jesus never claimed to be divine or God-like in Matthew, Mark or Luke - Bart Ehrman
000036
34
1:09
6906 views · 22 mins ago |
6 years ago
35 of 79
6906
1529332023
1711689767
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John could not read or write. Who wrote the Gospels? - Bart Ehrman
000069
35
2:27
2634 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
36 of 79
2634
1529332027
1711687136
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John have too many differences and contradictions - Bart Ehrman
000147
36
1:17
2464 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
37 of 79
2464
1529776893
1711682370
95% of our Jesus birth narrative comes from Luke - John Dominic Crossan
000077
37
3:22
6413 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
38 of 79
6413
1529793131
1711666581
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John... Where's the other Gospels, Acts and Epistles? - Bart Ehrman
000202
38
1:22
6211 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
39 of 79
6211
1530141496
1711656173
Matthew, Mark and Luke are similar and different. Were the Gospel differences 'inspired' by God? - Bart Ehrman
000082
39
0:26
3208 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
40 of 79
3208
1530141495
1711661084
Mark was copied by Matthew and Luke - Bart Ehrman
000026
40
0:45
2860 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
41 of 79
2860
1530141509
1711655848
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are NOT objective, historically accurate accounts of Jesus' life - Bart Ehrman
000045
41
2:06
3062 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
42 of 79
3062
1530142882
1711663009
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are written by Anonymous Authors in third-person (i.e. they) - Bart Ehrman
000126
42
2:29
3625 views · 2 mins ago |
6 years ago
43 of 79
3625
1530142891
1711690995
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John authored by highly-educated, literate, 2nd gen. Greek speakers - Bart Ehrman
000149
43
8:02
2636 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
44 of 79
2636
1530142905
1711656753
On Jesus' birth, Matthew and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000482
44
3:44
3402 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
45 of 79
3402
1530143088
1711656669
On Jesus' death, Mark and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000224
45
3:07
5406 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
46 of 79
5406
1530143053
1711685128
Luke's Gospel depicts Jesus as a prophet with a universal message, rejected by his people - Bart Ehrman
000187
46
1:54
6097 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
47 of 79
6097
1530143044
1711684584
Luke Gospel, a 14th century manuscript (109) proves a scribe incorrectly copied Jesus' geneology - Bart Ehrman
000114
47
0:41
5044 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
48 of 79
5044
1530742149
1711685468
If Mark's Gospel was based on eyewitness', why did Matthew & Luke 'radically' edit it? - Bart Ehrman
000041
48
1:37
4914 views · 23 mins ago |
6 years ago
49 of 79
4914
1530742143
1711689725
Irenaeus (180 AD) named popular, 'anonymous' texts Mark, Matthew, Luke, John for Apostolic reasons - Bart Ehrman
000097
49
1:12
4111 views · 18 hrs ago |
6 years ago
50 of 79
4111
1530742285
1711626714
Matthew and Luke 'revised' the order of historical events copied from Mark's Gospel - Richard Bauckham
000072
50
1:02
2950 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
51 of 79
2950
1530742021
1711656570
If Matthew and Luke revised Mark, what about the earlier 'unchecked' Oral tradition? - Bart Ehrman
000062
51
0:57
2129 views · 10 hrs ago |
6 years ago
52 of 79
2129
1531349688
1711654548
Mark, Matthew, Luke or John do not give eyewitness' names or their sources - Richard Carrier
000057
52
1:55
4026 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
53 of 79
4026
1531338369
1711686313
Jesus in Luke's Gospel plagarized from Elijah-Elisha in 1 Kings - Richard Carrier
000115
53
2:11
1816 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
54 of 79
1816
1531350464
1711661265
In Luke, the stories of Jesus-Temple and Jesus-Emeous bear striking similarities - Richard Carrier
000131
54
4:06
5248 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
55 of 79
5248
1531349897
1711662075
In Luke 16:20, Lazarus is fiction. John makes Lazarus into a real, dying/rising person - Richard Carrier
000246
55
2:40
7586 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
56 of 79
7586
1531349897
1711684984
On the Gospel writers: Matthew copied Mark, Luke copied Matthew and Mark, John copied Luke - Richard Carrier
000160
56
1:33
2577 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
57 of 79
2577
1531551571
1711669469
In Luke 11:2, the 'Lords Prayer' was probably elongated by later Scribes - Bruce Metzger
000093
57
2:00
5090 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
58 of 79
5090
1531555781
1711667076
On Luke 17:34, KJV translators added 'Men'. Earliest Greek Bible manuscripts have no 'Men' - Bruce Metzger
000120
58
0:36
2997 views · 9 hrs ago |
6 years ago
59 of 79
2997
1532037755
1711660491
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John do not compliment each other, but are 'competitive' - Charles Hedrick
000036
59
1:36
3384 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
60 of 79
3384
1532037762
1711667704
Mark, Matthew & Luke write of Jesus a mythical Jewish Man who did 'mighty deeds' - Charles Hedrick
000096
60
1:25
6045 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
61 of 79
6045
1532147216
1711679768
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John are 4 Gospels. Their are 34 more Gospels - Charles Hedrick
000085
61
1:11
3151 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
62 of 79
3151
1533831758
1711676096
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John are anonymous texts named later (false ascriptions) - Bart Ehrman
000071
62
0:38
10528 views · 1 min ago |
6 years ago
63 of 79
10528
1533564004
1711691027
After 100 years, Church Fathers refered to gospels as Matthew, Mark, Luke & John - Bart Ehrman
000038
63
7:10
4139 views · 10 hrs ago |
5 years ago
64 of 79
4139
1542651448
1711653590
Mark is the most reliable Gospel. Matthew, Luke and John are later 'corrections' of Mark - Godless Engineer
000430
64
13:11
5514 views · 1 hr ago |
5 years ago
65 of 79
5514
1547044666
1711686689
In Luke 10:18 and Acts 9:3, both Jesus and Apostle Paul saw 'flash of brightness'. Did they see Satan? - Jeffrey Daugherty
000791
65
13:09
3372 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
66 of 79
3372
1548092471
1711685575
In Luke 11:2, Jesus taught his disciples the Lord's Prayer, not Trinity - Muhammad Lamin
000789
66
8:25
4043 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
67 of 79
4043
1548093914
1711683522
In Luke 24:19, Jesus of Nazareth is called a man who was a 'Jewish Prophet' - Muhammad Lamin
000505
67
14:50
2833 views · 18 hrs ago |
5 years ago
68 of 79
2833
1549213440
1711625218
Gospel of Luke. Says who? (Comedy Anime)
000890
68
3:02
4109 views · 7 hrs ago |
5 years ago
69 of 79
4109
1549453760
1711665470
In Luke 1:35, Jesus is 'Son of God', not God, not Trinity - Anthony Buzzard
000182
69
1:11:46
3211 views · 16 hrs ago |
5 years ago
70 of 79
3211
1559006507
1711634337
In Luke 1:3, Luke was 'inspired' by other writings, and so he decided to write too - Mansur Ahmad vs Man
004306
70
3:55
6335 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
71 of 79
6335
1559259700
1711683078
Jesus became the Passover Lamb in John's Gospel, not Mark, Matthew or Luke - Tovia Singer
000235
71
2:28
5394 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
72 of 79
5394
1566862429
1711684732
John's Gospel is different from Mark, Matthew and Luke due to emerging Gnostic ideas - Kegan Chandler
000148
72
6:42
3878 views · 2 hrs ago |
4 years ago
73 of 79
3878
1570024798
1711683422
Was the 'fake' Jesus' Resurrection in Mark 9-20 copied by Matthew, Luke and John? - TruthSurge
000402
73
8:41
4053 views · 2 hrs ago |
4 years ago
74 of 79
4053
1570025788
1711683497
Gospel of Luke: 14% Reliability Score against 'US Federal Rules' - TruthSurge
000521
74
5:52
3351 views · 3 hrs ago |
4 years ago
75 of 79
3351
1570734745
1711680852
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John & Apostle Paul are not real, Historical men, but Literary fictitious characters - Joseph Atwill
000352
75
4:25
4372 views · 6 hrs ago |
4 years ago
76 of 79
4372
1570804850
1711668825
Jesus of Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John was a Jew - Adele Reinhartz
000265
76
3:30
7991 views · 6 mins ago |
4 years ago
77 of 79
7991
1571010245
1711690762
Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke, John disagreed over Torah, Jewish Law & Gentiles - Richard Carrier
000210
77
1:21
4056 views · 28 mins ago |
4 years ago
78 of 79
4056
1572279402
1711689413
Matthew and Luke copied from Gospel of Mark - Bart Ehrman
000081
78
3:26
4180 views · 9 hrs ago |
4 years ago
79 of 79
4180
1572279411
1711657025
Gospel Authors of Luke and Acts are Anonymous and Unknown - Bart Ehrman
000206
79
22004 views · 0 secs ago
IMPORTANT: All Scripture text has context and background. Scripture should never be read literally or in isolation. Always seek clarification from religious scholars and teachers. In general, Scripture adheres to four principles: (1) Literal Meaning - What the Scripture says (2) Historical Setting - The story events; how the Scripture was understood in its time (3) Grammar - The surrounding sentence and paragraph; textual context (4) Synthesis - A comparison with similar Scripture to give a better contextual understanding