Matthew
Chapter: 16
The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven.
6 of 28
He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red.
7 of 28
And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowring. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?
8 of 28
A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.
9 of 28
And when his disciples were come to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread.
10 of 28
Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.
11 of 28
And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have taken no bread.
12 of 28
Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread?
13 of 28
Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?
14 of 28
Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?
15 of 28
How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?
16 of 28
Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.
17 of 28
When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
18 of 28
And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
19 of 28
He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
20 of 28
And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
21 of 28
And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
22 of 28
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
23 of 28
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
24 of 28
Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
25 of 28
From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.
26 of 28
Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.
27 of 28
But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
28 of 28
Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
29 of 28
For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.
30 of 28
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
31 of 28
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
32 of 28
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
33 of 28
Matthew 16
CHURCH FATHERS: 17
1. Clement of Rome | CHURCH FATHER
97 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Clement of Rome
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
2. Ignatius of Antioch | CHURCH FATHER
110 AD
Matthew was REJECTED (0%) by Ignatius of Antioch
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
3. Barnabas | CHURCH FATHER
130 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Barnabas
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
4. Hermas | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Hermas
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
5. Papias of Hierapolis | CHURCH FATHER
140 AD
Matthew was REJECTED (0%) by Papias of Hierapolis
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
6. Polycarp | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Polycarp
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
7. Didache | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Didache
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
8. Diognetus | CHURCH FATHER
150 AD
Matthew was REJECTED (0%) by Diognetus
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
9. Justin Martyr | CHURCH FATHER
155 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Justin Martyr
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
10. Irenaeous | CHURCH FATHER
202 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Irenaeous
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
11. Clement of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
215 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Clement of Alexandria
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
12. Tertullian | CHURCH FATHER
220 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Tertullian
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
13. Origen | CHURCH FATHER
254 AD
Matthew was APPROVED (75%) by Origen
(Citation; approving quotation; alluded to; acceptable with changes)
14. Eusebius of Caesarea | CHURCH FATHER
340 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Eusebius of Caesarea
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
15. Athanasius of Alexandria | CHURCH FATHER
367 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Athanasius of Alexandria
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
16. Cyril of Jerusalem | CHURCH FATHER
386 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cyril of Jerusalem
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
17. Augustine of Hippo | CHURCH FATHER
400 AD
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Augustine of Hippo
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Matthew 16
BIBLE CANON: 5
A biblical canon is a set of texts (or "books") which a particular religious community regards as authoritative scripture. Christians were the first to use the term in reference to scripture.
These bible canons have developed through debate and agreement by the religious authorities.
1. Marcion Canon | BIBLE CANON
140 AD
Marcionism was a religious movement based on the teachings of the 2nd-century Marcion of Sinope. Marcions Canon lists 14 books out of the 27 books in the New Testament. More specifically, these were Luke and Paul's 13 writings. Marcion even rejected the entire Old Testament of 39 books.
bible.ca/marcion
Matthew was REJECTED (0%) by Marcion Canon
(No mention; no quotes; opinion unknown)
2. Muratorian Canon | BIBLE CANON
170 AD
The Muratorian Canon is an ancient list of New Testament books - the oldest such list we have found and lists 22 of the 27 books that were later included in the New Testament of the Christian Bible.
It is noteworthy that the Muratorian Canon omits several epistles that later did win acceptance in the Christian New Testament such as the books of James and 2 Peter.
gotquestions.org/muratorian
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Muratorian Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
3. Apostolic Canon | BIBLE CANON
300 AD
Apostolic Canons or Ecclesiastical Canons
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Apostolic Canon
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
4. Cheltenham/ Mommsen List | BIBLE CANON
360 AD
The Cheltenham or Mommsen List is a Latin manuscript discovered by the German classical scholar Theodor Mommsen (published 1886) which probably originated in North Africa in the 4th century.
It has 24-book Old Testament and 24-book New Testament which omits Jude and James, and perhaps Hebrews, and questions the epistles of John and Peter.
bible-researcher.com/cheltenham
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Cheltenham/ Mommsen List
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
5. Council of Rome | BIBLE CANON
382 AD
The Council of Rome was a meeting of Catholic Church officials and theologians which took place in 382 under the authority of Pope Damasus I, bishop of Rome.
According to a document appended to some manuscripts, the Council of Rome affirmed the authority of the Old and New Testament canon in a decretal or damasine list.
Matthew was FULLY ACCEPTED (100%) by Council of Rome
(Fully accepted; true scripture; quoted approvingly)
Matthew 16
TEXTUAL CRITICISM
Matthew 16
VIDEO: 113
42:32
5840 views · 36 mins ago |
9 years ago
1 of 113
5840
1438041600
1713888187
Can You Be Gay (Homosexual) and Christian? - Michael Brown vs Matthew Vines
002552
1
8:56
8262 views · 1 hr ago |
8 years ago
2 of 113
8262
1456185600
1713885534
Apostle Paul was the Antichrist according to Early Christians (Matthew 5:17) - Robert Price
000536
2
5:11
9416 views · 3 hrs ago |
8 years ago
3 of 113
9416
1456185600
1713881093
Who Wrote The Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John? - Bart Ehrman
000311
3
10:21
10509 views · 5 hrs ago |
7 years ago
4 of 113
10509
1483401600
1713871948
In Matthew 12:40, Jesus claims he will be in the Tomb for 3 days and 3 nights - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000621
4
4:51
4253 views · 9 hrs ago |
7 years ago
5 of 113
4253
1487808000
1713857537
In Matthew 24:36, why did Jesus deny knowledge of the final hour?
000291
5
9:05
9158 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
6 of 113
9158
1490659200
1713879355
In Matthew 15:25, why did Jesus call the woman a dog? - Hashim
000545
6
6:56
4068 views · 5 hrs ago |
7 years ago
7 of 113
4068
1490659200
1713873609
In Matthew 27:52, did the graves of Saints open up? - Mike Licona
000416
7
18:30
7133 views · 6 hrs ago |
7 years ago
8 of 113
7133
1490659200
1713867379
In Matthew 2:15, Out of Egypt I called my son - Is this referring to Jesus? - Tovia Singer
001110
8
1:22:49
7055 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
9 of 113
7055
1490659200
1713884716
In Matthew 15:24, Jesus said he came for the Lost Sheep of Israel - Mohammed Hijab vs PhD Josh
004969
9
5:09
5915 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
10 of 113
5915
1493856000
1713885044
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke and John actually author the Gospels? - Darrell Bock
000309
10
48:17
7415 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
11 of 113
7415
1493856000
1713885943
New Testament: Gospel of Matthew - Dale Martin 4/23
002897
11
8:16
2539 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
12 of 113
2539
1493856000
1713886606
Bible Project: Matthew
000496
12
14:11
6766 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
13 of 113
6766
1501545600
1713881599
In Matthew 5:32, can a divorced woman get re-married? - Hashim vs Richard London
000851
13
24:06
6466 views · 53 mins ago |
7 years ago
14 of 113
6466
1501545600
1713887183
In Matthew 10:34, Jesus did not bring Peace, but a Sword (violence) - Hashim vs Asian Christian
001446
14
6:05
3897 views · 8 mins ago |
7 years ago
15 of 113
3897
1501545600
1713889885
Forged Fiction: Gospel of Matthew
000365
15
37:39
5007 views · 10 hrs ago |
7 years ago
16 of 113
5007
1501545600
1713855438
In Matthew 24 and Luke 21, Jesus prophecized destruction of Jewish Temple. But, Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous Texts written AFTER the Event - Tovia Singer
002259
16
10:48
7733 views · 4 hrs ago |
7 years ago
17 of 113
7733
1501894583
1713877296
In Luke 8:45, Jesus asks who touched me. In Mark and Matthew's Gospel, why is a different account given? - Rizwan vs American Lady
000648
17
21:34
8627 views · 7 mins ago |
7 years ago
18 of 113
8627
1502135992
1713889898
In Psalm 118:22, Matthew 21:32 and Acts 4:11; was Jesus the Cornerstone whom the Builders rejected? - Tovia Singer
001294
18
1:13:24
4393 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
19 of 113
4393
1503645911
1713879488
If Matthew's Gospel was written by a Liar. Did the Holy Spirit inspire the Lies? - Hamza Myatt vs PhD Josh 1/2
004404
19
1:10:33
5318 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
20 of 113
5318
1503645952
1713880045
If Matthew's Gospel was written by a Liar. Did the Holy Spirit inspire the Lies? - Hamza Myatt vs PhD Josh 2/2
004233
20
6:02
4330 views · 9 hrs ago |
7 years ago
21 of 113
4330
1504459841
1713858116
In Matthew 2:1, Three Wise Men came to Baby Jesus bearing gifts of Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh - OR - Were they actually Magicians and Sorcerers? - Religion For Breakfast
000362
21
59:47
6538 views · 8 hrs ago |
7 years ago
22 of 113
6538
1504459863
1713860124
In Matthew 28:19, Baptisms should have been in the Name of Father, Son and Holy Spirit - Hashim vs Spanish Lady
003587
22
12:06
22901 views · 3 hrs ago |
7 years ago
23 of 113
22901
1505259041
1713881198
In Exodus 3:14, John 6:20, John 8:24, John 8:58, Mark 6:50, Mark 13:6, Luke 21:8, Matthew 14:27 and Acts 26:29 Jesus claims I AM (Ego Eimi) God - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000726
23
47:41
9920 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
24 of 113
9920
1508492852
1713881413
In Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1, Jesus came from Egypt. No other gospel narrates this event - Hamza Myatt vs Protestant Rich
002861
24
1:07:49
5934 views · 33 mins ago |
6 years ago
25 of 113
5934
1509437120
1713888342
In Matthew 15:24, Jesus claimed he was only sent to the Jews. But you claim Jesus came for the Gentiles (non-Jews) - Hamza Myatt vs Preacher Paul
004069
25
24:01
7854 views · 7 hrs ago |
6 years ago
26 of 113
7854
1510767852
1713866259
The 3 most questionnable Bible verses: Luke 23:44, Mark 15:38 or Matthew 27:52? - Ken Humphreys
001441
26
12:06
4437 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
27 of 113
4437
1510817351
1713880709
Contradictions in the Birth and Geneaology of Jesus in the gospels of Matthew and Luke - Ken Humphreys
000726
27
26:58
6267 views · 40 mins ago |
6 years ago
28 of 113
6267
1511300162
1713887934
The Biblical gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John) were originally 'Nameless' Anonymous Texts - Daniel Wallace
001618
28
8:41
4879 views · 54 mins ago |
6 years ago
29 of 113
4879
1511414822
1713887107
In Matthew 2:1, the three Kings (Magi) from the East followed a Star to baby Jesus were Pagans? - Tovia Singer
000521
29
1:32
4221 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
30 of 113
4221
1512437630
1713870774
Jesus was not God according to Mark, Matthew, Luke and Apostle Paul - Karen Armstrong
000092
30
19:58
7739 views · 9 hrs ago |
6 years ago
31 of 113
7739
1512437634
1713858896
In Mark 6:52 and Matthew 14:33, Jesus walked on water. Did the disciples turn away or turn towards Jesus - Paul William vs Christian
001198
31
1:38
4007 views · 20 hrs ago |
6 years ago
32 of 113
4007
1512438070
1713819614
Matthew was originally in Aramaic. Anonymous scribes translated to Greek - Mike Licona
000098
32
2:29
1985 views · 1 day ago |
6 years ago
33 of 113
1985
1512438067
1713801235
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are Anonymous pre-existing Texts. We do not have any Originals - Mike Licona
000149
33
28:13
5783 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
34 of 113
5783
1512501625
1713880753
Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong
001693
34
35:17
6279 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
35 of 113
6279
1512501630
1713872358
From Isaiah 60:3, Matthew copies the Christmas Story. Baby Jesus born to Joseph, a fatherly figure invented to reconcile warring Jewish tribes - John Spong
002117
35
2:08
3423 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
36 of 113
3423
1513438705
1713879195
Originally, the Gospel of Matthew was an Anonymous text with no known Author. Who chose the name Matthew, when and why?
000128
36
22:14
4745 views · 9 hrs ago |
6 years ago
37 of 113
4745
1513818052
1713857785
In Matthew 24:36, No one knows the Hour, except the Father - Shamsi vs Christian
001334
37
11:40
4633 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
38 of 113
4633
1514249579
1713877799
In Matthew 19:5, Jesus defined Marriage between Man and Woman - Robert Jeffress
000700
38
8:12
5763 views · 11 hrs ago |
6 years ago
39 of 113
5763
1514850983
1713849289
In Matthew 28:19, the Trinity text was a later insertion and corruption, after 200 AD, by the Catholic church
000492
39
5:29
9253 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
40 of 113
9253
1514850975
1713886709
In Matthew 28:19, is not a Trinitarian verse. Trinity came through evolution and Early Church Fathers in 325 and 451 AD finally - Anthony Buzzard
000329
40
6:10
9417 views · 9 hrs ago |
6 years ago
41 of 113
9417
1515151323
1713857652
In Matthew 28:19, before Nicaea, Bible manuscripts had no Trinity. After Nicaea 325 AD, Trinity appeared in later manuscripts - Carey Clark
000370
41
9:17
7556 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
42 of 113
7556
1516837967
1713870934
In Matthew 1:23 and Isaiah 7:14, was the virgin birth of Immanuel really Jesus? - Trinity Delusion
000557
42
11:12
7716 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
43 of 113
7716
1516837961
1713879131
In Matthew 1:23, why is Jesus called Immanuel? - John Schoenheit (BiblicalUnitarian)
000672
43
5:08
2726 views · 5 hrs ago |
6 years ago
44 of 113
2726
1518390851
1713870974
In Matthew 4:1, Is Jesus God or part of God? - Incognito
000308
44
3:01
3743 views · 33 mins ago |
6 years ago
45 of 113
3743
1519923783
1713888356
In Matthew 28:19, will everyone in the World become Christians? - Michael Brown
000181
45
33:57
4861 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
46 of 113
4861
1522452149
1713880578
Matthew copied Mark. Therefore, Matthew believed Mark's Gospel was imperfect and not God's word - Zakir Hussain vs Christian Colin
002037
46
59:12
3176 views · 13 hrs ago |
6 years ago
47 of 113
3176
1523592047
1713842947
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - Ali Ataie
003552
47
0:45
5156 views · 47 mins ago |
6 years ago
48 of 113
5156
1526689243
1713887538
Gospel of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were written by anonymous Authors - Daniel Wallace
000045
48
20:01
2211 views · 16 hrs ago |
6 years ago
49 of 113
2211
1526869665
1713832903
In Matthew 1:17, Matthew makes a textual mistake. Was Matthew truthful, inspired by Spirit or a Liar? - Mansur vs Suzy 1/2
001201
49
13:51
2174 views · 16 hrs ago |
6 years ago
50 of 113
2174
1526869664
1713832907
In Matthew 1:17, Matthew makes a textual mistake. Was Matthew truthful, inspired by Spirit or a Liar? - Mansur vs Suzy 2/2
000831
50
33:46
4085 views · 1 hr ago |
6 years ago
51 of 113
4085
1526986088
1713885105
In Matthew 27:52, a Zombie Apocalypse occurs with no eye-witness testimony. Get in your Time machine! - Paul William vs Lizzie
002026
51
3:15
4429 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
52 of 113
4429
1529106402
1713869028
Matthew and John quote Jesus' sermons 50 years after he died.. Really? - Bart Ehrman
000195
52
0:16
7315 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
53 of 113
7315
1529106416
1713880675
Gospels were not written by Mark, Matthew, Luke or John. These names were decided 100 years later - Bart Ehrman
000016
53
3:53
2955 views · 1 day ago |
6 years ago
54 of 113
2955
1529281428
1713765163
John copies from Mark, Matthew and Luke and adds his own reasoning, experts agree - Richard Carrier
000233
54
0:36
3196 views · 8 hrs ago |
6 years ago
55 of 113
3196
1529332033
1713862561
Jesus never claimed to be divine or God-like in Matthew, Mark or Luke - Bart Ehrman
000036
55
1:09
7100 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
56 of 113
7100
1529332023
1713883431
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John could not read or write. Who wrote the Gospels? - Bart Ehrman
000069
56
2:15
4082 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
57 of 113
4082
1529332043
1713879587
Gospel of Matthew: A collection of anonymous Jesus' stories, entitled 100 years later - Bart Ehrman
000135
57
2:27
2732 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
58 of 113
2732
1529332027
1713868942
Mark, Matthew, Luke and John have too many differences and contradictions - Bart Ehrman
000147
58
3:22
6558 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
59 of 113
6558
1529793131
1713879719
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John... Where's the other Gospels, Acts and Epistles? - Bart Ehrman
000202
59
1:22
6426 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
60 of 113
6426
1530141496
1713879348
Matthew, Mark and Luke are similar and different. Were the Gospel differences 'inspired' by God? - Bart Ehrman
000082
60
0:26
3328 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
61 of 113
3328
1530141495
1713869392
Mark was copied by Matthew and Luke - Bart Ehrman
000026
61
0:45
2949 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
62 of 113
2949
1530141509
1713869510
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are NOT objective, historically accurate accounts of Jesus' life - Bart Ehrman
000045
62
2:06
3181 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
63 of 113
3181
1530142882
1713869295
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are written by Anonymous Authors in third-person (i.e. they) - Bart Ehrman
000126
63
2:29
3734 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
64 of 113
3734
1530142891
1713882229
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John authored by highly-educated, literate, 2nd gen. Greek speakers - Bart Ehrman
000149
64
8:02
2719 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
65 of 113
2719
1530142905
1713878272
On Jesus' birth, Matthew and Luke give different accounts - Bart Ehrman
000482
65
2:08
5602 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
66 of 113
5602
1530143083
1713877895
Matthew depicts Jesus as a Jewish Messiah, and emphasizes Jewish Law - Bart Ehrman
000128
66
0:53
4359 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
67 of 113
4359
1530143835
1713868921
Anonymous Texts given Apostolic titles, Matthew, Mark etc. to qualify for Bible NT canon - Bart Ehrman
000053
67
1:34
4901 views · 9 mins ago |
6 years ago
68 of 113
4901
1530143845
1713889817
Matthew recalls Jesus' 2000-word 'Sermon On The Mount', 55 years after Jesus delivered it? - Bart Ehrman
000094
68
0:41
5239 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
69 of 113
5239
1530742149
1713879378
If Mark's Gospel was based on eyewitness', why did Matthew & Luke 'radically' edit it? - Bart Ehrman
000041
69
1:37
5130 views · 50 mins ago |
6 years ago
70 of 113
5130
1530742143
1713887365
Irenaeus (180 AD) named popular, 'anonymous' texts Mark, Matthew, Luke, John for Apostolic reasons - Bart Ehrman
000097
70
2:31
5270 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
71 of 113
5270
1530742098
1713879114
Papias (163 AD) described Matthew's Gospel as Jesus' sayings written in Hebrew - Bart Ehrman vs Richard Bauckham
000151
71
1:12
4240 views · 4 hrs ago |
6 years ago
72 of 113
4240
1530742285
1713876460
Matthew and Luke 'revised' the order of historical events copied from Mark's Gospel - Richard Bauckham
000072
72
1:02
3050 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
73 of 113
3050
1530742021
1713879607
If Matthew and Luke revised Mark, what about the earlier 'unchecked' Oral tradition? - Bart Ehrman
000062
73
0:57
2183 views · 23 hrs ago |
6 years ago
74 of 113
2183
1531349688
1713807707
Mark, Matthew, Luke or John do not give eyewitness' names or their sources - Richard Carrier
000057
74
3:03
4671 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
75 of 113
4671
1531349707
1713880405
In Matthew's Gospel, an 'onion ring' structure points to the Jesus Christ myth - Richard Carrier
000183
75
2:16
5860 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
76 of 113
5860
1531349807
1713879876
In Matthew's Gospel, an 'onion ring' structure details Jesus' Crucifixion - Richard Carrier
000136
76
2:40
7751 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
77 of 113
7751
1531349897
1713879325
On the Gospel writers: Matthew copied Mark, Luke copied Matthew and Mark, John copied Luke - Richard Carrier
000160
77
0:36
3079 views · 33 mins ago |
6 years ago
78 of 113
3079
1532037755
1713888365
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John do not compliment each other, but are 'competitive' - Charles Hedrick
000036
78
1:36
3484 views · 2 hrs ago |
6 years ago
79 of 113
3484
1532037762
1713882880
Mark, Matthew & Luke write of Jesus a mythical Jewish Man who did 'mighty deeds' - Charles Hedrick
000096
79
1:25
6226 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
80 of 113
6226
1532147216
1713879341
Mark, Matthew, Luke & John are 4 Gospels. Their are 34 more Gospels - Charles Hedrick
000085
80
1:11
3263 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
81 of 113
3263
1533831758
1713869051
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John are anonymous texts named later (false ascriptions) - Bart Ehrman
000071
81
0:38
10819 views · 3 hrs ago |
6 years ago
82 of 113
10819
1533564004
1713879054
After 100 years, Church Fathers refered to gospels as Matthew, Mark, Luke & John - Bart Ehrman
000038
82
3:04
5518 views · 16 hrs ago |
6 years ago
83 of 113
5518
1533924568
1713833227
Using Matthew 19:12, Origen (d. 253 AD), an early Church Father castrated himself, removed his private part - Steven Anderson
000184
83
4:52
2876 views · 6 hrs ago |
6 years ago
84 of 113
2876
1535194567
1713869932
In Matthew 1:18, Jesus had a begining. He was 'born' into existence - Bart Ehrman (Restoration Fellllowship)
000292
84
10:13
2913 views · 3 mins ago |
5 years ago
85 of 113
2913
1541415740
1713890178
Matthew misquotes Old Testament verse - Peleh Ben Avraham
000613
85
7:10
4260 views · 4 hrs ago |
5 years ago
86 of 113
4260
1542651448
1713876497
Mark is the most reliable Gospel. Matthew, Luke and John are later 'corrections' of Mark - Godless Engineer
000430
86
20:39
4906 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
87 of 113
4906
1548092471
1713871206
In Matthew 10:5, Jesus commanded his disciples preach to Israelites only ('lost sheep of Israel'), not Gentiles - Muhammad Lamin
001239
87
16:50
3596 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
88 of 113
3596
1548092464
1713871215
In Matthew 27:46, Jesus cried to God. Yet, Jesus himself is 'fully' God? - Muhammad Lamin
001010
88
11:42
4358 views · 52 mins ago |
5 years ago
89 of 113
4358
1548092819
1713887206
In Matthew 26:39, Jesus prayed to God to save him from death (Crucifixion) in Gethsemane - Muhammad Lamin
000702
89
9:36
3731 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
90 of 113
3731
1548092817
1713871250
In Matthew 12:18, God refers to Jesus as a servant, and nothing more - Muhammad Lamin
000576
90
39:55
5315 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
91 of 113
5315
1549300283
1713879823
In Matthew 4:23, Jesus preached the gospel to the people. Can Matthew be the same gospel? - Mansur Ahmed vs American
002395
91
10:35
5159 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
92 of 113
5159
1549300191
1713871303
In Matthew 4:8, Satan took Jesus (God) willingly up the high mountain; contrary to James 1:13 - Adnan Rashid vs Christian
000635
92
21:04
3541 views · 4 hrs ago |
5 years ago
93 of 113
3541
1554734214
1713875166
In Matthew 2:23 and Zechariah 3:8, the branch (Nazar) translates to Jesus the Nazarene? - Sadat Anwar vs Christian 1/2
001264
93
13:47
2875 views · 24 hrs ago |
5 years ago
94 of 113
2875
1554734218
1713804401
In Matthew 2:23 and Zechariah 3:8, the branch (Nazar) translates to Jesus the Nazarene? - Sadat Anwar vs Christian 2/2
000827
94
11:23
3550 views · 10 hrs ago |
5 years ago
95 of 113
3550
1556045685
1713856033
In Daniel 7:13 and Matthew 16:27, 'Son of Man' is the Jewish nation, or Jewish Messiah, but not Jesus - Eli Cohen
000683
95
33:19
5124 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
96 of 113
5124
1557624702
1713871625
In Matthew 28:17, even 'some' Apostles doubted Jesus' resurrection - Jeffrey Daugherty
001999
96
24:29
4767 views · 5 hrs ago |
5 years ago
97 of 113
4767
1557767434
1713871633
In Matthew 4:19, Jesus was in the 'People Fishing' business - Jeffrey Daugherty
001469
97
1:44
4283 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
98 of 113
4283
1558442754
1713880853
Some Bible scholars believe Matthew did not write Matthew's gospel - Frank Turek
000104
98
10:13
4454 views · 8 hrs ago |
5 years ago
99 of 113
4454
1558567640
1713863281
In Matthew 16:20, Jesus prohibited teaching he was the Christ (Anointed) - Jeffrey Daugherty
000613
99
34:09
3904 views · 4 hrs ago |
5 years ago
100 of 113
3904
1558810479
1713875870
In Matthew 9:13, Jesus desired Mercy not (be) Sacrificed on Cross - Jeffrey Daugherty
002049
100
3:55
6522 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
101 of 113
6522
1559259700
1713880051
Jesus became the Passover Lamb in John's Gospel, not Mark, Matthew or Luke - Tovia Singer
000235
101
20:36
4467 views · 4 hrs ago |
5 years ago
102 of 113
4467
1559263831
1713876835
In Matthew 15:24, Jesus called the Woman a Dog, then medicated her Daughter - Kane vs Muslim
001236
102
10:08
6983 views · 24 mins ago |
5 years ago
103 of 113
6983
1562627923
1713888897
In Matthew 27:52, thousands of dead rose from their graves. Is Jesus' resurrection a greater miracle? - Mansur Ahmad vs Christian 1/2
000608
103
20:53
7204 views · 3 hrs ago |
5 years ago
104 of 113
7204
1562627745
1713878783
In Matthew 27:52, thousands of dead rose from their graves. Is Jesus' resurrection a greater miracle? - Mansur Ahmad vs Christian 2/2
001253
104
2:28
5603 views · 24 mins ago |
5 years ago
105 of 113
5603
1566862429
1713888873
John's Gospel is different from Mark, Matthew and Luke due to emerging Gnostic ideas - Kegan Chandler
000148
105
11:22
4741 views · 41 mins ago |
5 years ago
106 of 113
4741
1570024754
1713887850
Gospel of Matthew: 29% Reliability Score against 'US Federal Rules' - TruthSurge 1/2
000682
106
8:44
4758 views · 29 mins ago |
5 years ago
107 of 113
4758
1570024733
1713888598
Gospel of Matthew: 29% Reliability Score against 'US Federal Rules' - TruthSurge 2/2
000524
107
2:15
3700 views · 53 mins ago |
5 years ago
108 of 113
3700
1570024789
1713887149
In Mark 16:5 & Matthew 28:2, a Man changes to Angel - TruthSurge
000135
108
6:42
3997 views · 41 mins ago |
5 years ago
109 of 113
3997
1570024798
1713887906
Was the 'fake' Jesus' Resurrection in Mark 9-20 copied by Matthew, Luke and John? - TruthSurge
000402
109
5:52
3451 views · 1 hr ago |
5 years ago
110 of 113
3451
1570734745
1713885036
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John & Apostle Paul are not real, Historical men, but Literary fictitious characters - Joseph Atwill
000352
110
4:25
4537 views · 2 hrs ago |
5 years ago
111 of 113
4537
1570804850
1713882061
Jesus of Gospels: Mark, Matthew, Luke & John was a Jew - Adele Reinhartz
000265
111
3:30
8217 views · 55 mins ago |
5 years ago
112 of 113
8217
1571010245
1713887027
Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke, John disagreed over Torah, Jewish Law & Gentiles - Richard Carrier
000210
112
1:21
4236 views · 2 hrs ago |
4 years ago
113 of 113
4236
1572279402
1713882028
Matthew and Luke copied from Gospel of Mark - Bart Ehrman
000081
113
35328 views · 0 secs ago
IMPORTANT: All Scripture text has context and background. Scripture should never be read literally or in isolation. Always seek clarification from religious scholars and teachers. In general, Scripture adheres to four principles: (1) Literal Meaning - What the Scripture says (2) Historical Setting - The story events; how the Scripture was understood in its time (3) Grammar - The surrounding sentence and paragraph; textual context (4) Synthesis - A comparison with similar Scripture to give a better contextual understanding