8562 views · 8 hrs ago | Author: Guest • Updated: 19 Jun 2019 |
5768
1502278627
1711668360
99% of the foremost Bible Scholars, believe the historical Jesus in Mark's Gospel is more accurate than John's Gospel - Paul William vs Richard London
000754
8
5599
1512501625
1711673708
Jesus' Crucifixion is a celebrated Triumph in John, but a sad Tragedy in Mark, Matthew and Luke's gospel - John Spong
001693
11
5314
1529332037
1711671120
In John, Jesus is a God-like diety from Heaven. In earlier Gospels, Jesus is more of a man-prophet - Bart Ehrman
000119
16
3049
1532036808
1711671697
John's Gospel presents Jesus as a pre-existing divine Son, coming from the Father - Charles Hedrick
000119
25
5952
1566862375
1711648339
John's Gospel wrote a 'multi-level' history to counter Gnostic views on Jesus - Kegan Chandler
000061
39
4577
1566862352
1711673450
Evidence that John's Gospel used Poemandres (Hermetic, Pagan, c. 50 AD) as a Source - Kegan Chandler
000540
42
5978
1566862333
1711666193
John's Gospel depicts 'the right' Jesus; against Judaism, Gnostic-Christianity and Hermetism - Kegan Chandler
000130
45
4832
1570022293
1711623103
Mark's Gospel casts James & John, Jesus' disciples from Castor & Polydeuces, brothers in Greek mythology - TruthSurge
000899
46
2794
1570804863
1711677504
John's Gospel presents high Christology, and an ambiguous 'divine' Jewish Jesus - Adele Reinhartz
000463
51